3D-MIMO Beam Selection Reducing CSI Feedback Overhead

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-antenna wireless communication systems, existing methods for channel state information feedback are inefficient in reducing overhead while maintaining sufficient beamforming gain, particularly in 3D-MIMO environments with a large number of antennas, leading to increased interference and reduced data transmission efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method for channel state information feedback in 3D-MIMO systems, where user equipment receives information on N precoded beams, selects a specific beam, and determines interference from M beams, generating CSI based on this interference to reduce feedback overhead and enhance beamforming efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If channel state information feedback is performed using all N beams in 3D-MIMO systems, then beamforming gain is sufficient, but feedback overhead increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeamforming gainVSAvoidfeedback overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the N beams into a specific beam and M interference beams, where the UE selectively processes only the most relevant beams for feedback. This segmentation allows the system to maintain sufficient beamforming gain by focusing on the dominant beam while reducing overhead by excluding less significant beams from feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by treating different beams differently - the specific beam receives full processing and feedback attention to ensure beamforming gain, while other beams are processed only to the extent needed for interference determination. This selective processing quality optimizes the trade-off between performance and overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If interference from all N beams is considered, then interference reduction is maximized, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by considering interference from only M beams (where M < N) rather than all N beams. The UE determines interference based on a subset of beams that are most relevant to the specific beam, achieving sufficient interference reduction without the excessive computational complexity of processing all beams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of beam quantity from N to M for interference determination. By adjusting this parameter to consider only the most significant interference sources, the system reduces processing complexity while maintaining effective interference mitigation for the specific beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If CSI feedback is performed for all beams, then channel state accuracy is maintained, but data transmission efficiency decreases due to overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel state accuracyVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential CSI feedback for the specific beam and essential interference information from M beams, excluding redundant feedback for other beams. This extraction maintains channel state accuracy for the most important beam while improving data transmission efficiency by reducing feedback overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If the number of antennas is increased in 3D-MIMO systems, then system capacity improves, but feedback overhead and interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidfeedback overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large number of antennas into N total beams, further divided into 1 specific beam and M interference beams. This hierarchical segmentation allows the system to leverage the capacity benefits of many antennas while managing feedback overhead by focusing processing on a subset of relevant beams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing interference from only M beams out of N total beams in systems with many antennas. This approach maintains system capacity benefits from the large antenna array while avoiding the excessive feedback overhead that would result from processing all beams equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10368354B2Channel state information feedback method in multi-antenna wireless communication system and apparatus therefor
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10368354B2 patent drawing
  • US10368354B2 patent drawing
  • US10368354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for feeding back channel state information in a wireless communication system supporting a three-dimensional multiple input multiple output (3D-MIMO) antenna. Specifically, the method comprises the steps of: receiving information on N beams, (where N is a natural number), precoded for specific antennas among a plurality of antennas constituting a 3D-MIMO antenna; selecting, from among the N beams, at least one specific beam for which to generate channel state information, and determining interference on the basis of M beams, (where M is a natural number, M≤N−1), among the remaining beams; and generating channel state information for the specific beam on the basis of the interference according to the M beams.