3D Model Printability Repair and Print Bureau Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Most 3D models submitted by customers for printing are not printable due to design issues, leading to manual communication challenges and rejection of less expensive designs without adequate feedback, resulting in 3D printing bureaus focusing on high-value clients and rejecting lower-value designs.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a network interface to obtain 3D models, a print bureau data collection engine to identify capable print bureaus, and automatic analysis and repair engines to ensure printability, converting models into accepted formats and presenting suitable print bureaus to customers, thereby improving print quality and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic analysis and repair engines are implemented to ensure printability, then the likelihood of successful printing is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprintabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis and repair of 3D models before printing to ensure printability. The automatic analysis engine checks models for errors and the repair engine corrects them automatically, preventing printing failures before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components (analysis engine, repair engine, format conversion engine) between the customer's 3D model and the printing process. These intermediaries automatically process and prepare models, acting as mediators that ensure compatibility and printability without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual communication and model verification are used, then customization and quality control are improved, but the productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel qualityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service processing where the automatic analysis and repair engines independently verify and correct 3D models without requiring manual communication between customers and print bureau staff. This automation maintains quality control while significantly increasing processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (human verification, communication, and model preparation) with automated computational systems. The analysis and repair engines automatically perform tasks that previously required human intervention, maintaining precision while eliminating communication delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If print bureaus focus on high-value clients only, then service quality for premium customers is improved, but the quantity of processed designs decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidnumber of designs processed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system provides universal service capabilities that can handle diverse 3D models from any customer segment. The analysis and repair engines work uniformly on all models regardless of value, enabling the print bureau to serve both high-value and lower-value clients with consistent quality while processing a larger volume of designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3186733B1Three-dimensional printing
Publication Date: 2021.08.04 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3186733B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3186733B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3186733B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The claimed subject matter includes techniques for printing a three-dimensional (3D) object. An example system includes a network interface to obtain a 3D model from a client system. The example system also includes a print bureau data collection engine to identify capabilities of a plurality of print bureaus. The example system also includes a print bureau filter to compare characteristics of the 3D model with capabilities of the plurality of print bureaus to identify a subset of the plurality print bureaus that are able to print the 3D model and send the subset to the client system via the network interface.