3D Model Generation for Real Estate Development Sites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developers and municipalities face challenges in rapidly creating three-dimensional models of real estate development programs for downtown areas, which hinders the visualization and approval of development plans by municipal authorities, particularly in assessing economic, social, and environmental impacts.

Innovation Solution

A system and process that evaluates regions based on social, environmental, and economic criteria, using a graphical representation to create a three-dimensional model, allowing for the visualization of redevelopment scenarios, involving data input from various sources, drone mapping, community feedback, and weighted criteria for design preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional methods are used to create three-dimensional models of real estate development programs, then the models can be created with sufficient detail, but the process is time-consuming and prevents rapid visualization and approval by municipal authorities

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvespeed of creating three-dimensional modelsVSAvoidtime for model creation and approval process

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing a database of three-dimensional building models and development typologies that can be rapidly deployed. Municipalities and developers can quickly visualize development scenarios by selecting from pre-configured models rather than creating them from scratch, dramatically reducing the time required to present and approve development plans

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by implementing pre-configured three-dimensional building models and development typologies that can be replicated and adapted across different sites. These standardized models can be quickly instantiated and modified to match specific development requirements, enabling rapid model creation while maintaining sufficient detail for municipal approval

Inventive Principle:

Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If comprehensive evaluation criteria are used to assess development impacts, then the assessment becomes thorough and informative, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecompleteness of development impact assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system

Core Design Contradiction:

Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is segmented into three distinct but integrated modules: social criteria evaluation, environmental criteria evaluation, and economic criteria evaluation. Each module assesses specific aspects of development impact independently, then the results are integrated to provide a comprehensive assessment. This segmentation reduces system complexity by breaking down the comprehensive evaluation into manageable, specialized components

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240346761A1System and process for creating a three-dimensional model of a real estate development site

Publication Date: 2024.10.17 RENAISSANCE V&A TECH LLC

AI summary

There is disclosed a system and process for creating a graphical representation of a re-development location. The system can perform the process of locating a region based upon different criteria such as present and future social economic and environmental criteria. Finally, the system can perform the step of presenting the re-developed site graphically via a three-dimensional representation of the re-developed location including data associated with the social criteria, the environmental criteria, and the economic criteria.