3D Model Surface Reflectance via Segmented Diffuse Specular Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing technologies fail to accurately convey the light reflectance properties of objects, resulting in models that do not properly differentiate between color and specular components, leading to a lack of realism in surface details.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize specular and diffuse data from object surfaces, processed into 3D model reflectance properties, allowing for the accurate representation of surface shininess and color through the selection of appropriate printing materials and the application of reflective coatings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional 3D printing processes are used, then the printing process is simple and fast, but the surface details and light reflectance properties are not accurately conveyed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface detail accuracyVSAvoidprinting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reflectance properties into separate diffuse and specular components. The diffuse map contains color and texture information while the specular map contains shininess and reflectance information. This segmentation allows the printing system to handle different surface properties independently, improving surface detail accuracy without requiring complete reconstruction of all optical properties in a single complex process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying the printing process and material selection based on local surface properties. Different printing parameters, materials, and post-processing techniques are applied to different regions of the model depending on their specular vs. diffuse characteristics. This enables accurate reproduction of diverse surface details across the model while maintaining a relatively simple overall printing framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple printing materials and post-processing steps are used to achieve accurate reflectance properties, then surface realism is improved, but manufacturing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflectance property accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-processing the input images to separate diffuse and specular components before the printing process begins. The diffuse and specular maps are generated in advance and used to guide material selection and printing parameters. This preliminary separation allows the actual printing process to proceed more efficiently without requiring complex real-time adjustments, thus reducing overall manufacturing time while maintaining reflectance accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by adjusting printing parameters such as layer height, infill density, and material temperature based on the specular map data. Regions requiring high specular reflection use different printing parameters compared to diffuse regions. This dynamic parameter adjustment enables accurate reflectance reproduction while optimizing print speed by applying less intensive parameters to diffuse regions that don't require post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If separate diffuse and specular data are processed, then surface reflectance accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflectance data accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the specular component from the original color image to create a separate specular map. This extraction process isolates the reflectance information from the color and texture information, allowing each to be processed independently. The extraction uses relatively simple image processing techniques such as polarization filtering or specular highlight detection, avoiding the need for complex multi-camera setups or sophisticated optical measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copy representations of the surface properties in the form of diffuse and specular maps. These maps are 2D representations that capture the essential reflectance characteristics without requiring full 3D optical property reconstruction. The maps serve as intermediate data structures that are easier to process and store than complete reflectance function models, reducing data processing complexity while maintaining the necessary accuracy for guiding the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10573064B2Generating 3D models with surface details
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 OTOY INC
  • US10573064B2 patent drawing
  • US10573064B2 patent drawing
  • US10573064B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating a model of an object that includes the surface reflectance details of the object are disclosed. The surface reflectance properties of the object comprising at least separate components for the object diffuse data and the object specular data are received. A 3D model of the object is generated wherein the reflectance properties of the model are configured based on the reflectance properties of the object surface. The object diffuse data determines the color to be used in generating the model and the object specular data determines one of the attributes of the coating for the model or the material to be used for generating the model.