3D Object Detection Using Multi-View BEV Depth Transformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D object detection technologies rely heavily on expensive sensors like LiDAR and suffer from complex data processing and reduced accuracy due to single-view methods, necessitating a more cost-effective and accurate approach.

Innovation Solution

A method involving multi-view image analysis using a view transformer and BEV encoder to extract 3D feature maps, incorporating domain adaptation adapters for relative depth normalization and photometric matching to enhance accuracy and adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LiDAR sensors are used for 3D object detection, then detection accuracy is improved, but device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsensor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses multiple 2D camera images as copies of the 3D scene from different viewpoints, replacing the need for direct 3D sensing with LiDAR. By synthesizing 3D information from multiple 2D image copies, the system achieves accurate 3D object detection without expensive LiDAR sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical LiDAR sensing system with a computational imaging approach using standard 2D cameras and neural network processing. The view transformer and BEV encoder algorithmically reconstruct 3D spatial relationships, substituting physical 3D sensing hardware with software-based 3D reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If single-view methods are used for 3D object detection, then device complexity is reduced, but depth information accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoiddepth information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms 2D image data into 3D spatial representation by introducing the bird's eye view dimension. The BEV encoder projects 3D feature maps into a top-down 2D plane, adding vertical dimension information to the detection process and enabling accurate depth estimation without increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the view transformer module universal by enabling it to process multiple 2D images from different cameras and transform them into a unified 3D feature map. This multi-functional module handles both 2D feature extraction and 3D spatial transformation, improving depth accuracy without requiring separate processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If multi-view images are used for 3D object detection, then depth information accuracy is improved, but device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth information accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple 2D feature maps from different camera views into a single unified 3D feature map using the view transformer. By combining spatial information from multiple sources into one integrated representation, the system achieves accurate depth information while streamlining the processing pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex multi-view processing task into distinct functional modules: 2D feature extraction by the image backbone, 3D transformation by the view transformer, and BEV projection by the BEV encoder. This modular segmentation reduces overall processing complexity by making each stage specialized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If domain adaptation adapters are added for relative depth normalization, then detection accuracy across varying camera parameters is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts depth parameters through relative depth normalization, modifying the depth scale and offset based on camera intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. This parameter adaptation enables accurate depth prediction across different camera configurations without requiring complete model retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces domain adaptation adapters as intermediary modules between the base neural network and the output layers. These adapters mediate the transformation of features to account for domain differences in camera parameters, improving generalization accuracy while adding minimal complexity through plug-and-play integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250356667A1Method and apparatus with three-dimensional object detection
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250356667A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356667A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356667A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of detecting a three-dimensional (3D) object includes: extracting two-dimensional (2D) image features from images using an image backbone; extracting a 3D feature map, reflecting depth prediction information, from the 2D image features by using a view transformer configured to perform domain generalization; extracting a bird's eye view (BEV) feature from the 3D feature map by using a BEV encoder; and predicting a position of the object and a class of the object from the BEV feature by using a detection head.