3D Object Detection via Hierarchical Classifier Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D object detection methods face challenges in efficiently classifying objects within large 3D data sets due to high noise levels and computational complexity, particularly in medical applications like tumor detection in 3D lung images, where distinguishing between object and non-object locations is time-consuming and difficult.

Innovation Solution

A boosting method incorporating feature cost is employed to optimize detection performance and computational costs by generating weak learners and building a classifier that selects the best features for classification, using a combination of weak and strong classifiers to minimize detection performance and feature computational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional classification methods are used to distinguish object locations from non-object locations in 3D data, then detection accuracy can be maintained, but the training time and computational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification process into multiple stages: first using a coarse classifier to quickly eliminate obvious non-object regions, then progressively applying finer classifiers only to candidate regions. This segmentation reduces the overall training time by avoiding exhaustive processing of all 3D data while maintaining detection accuracy through multi-stage verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources only on regions that have a reasonable probability of containing objects. Instead of uniformly processing entire 3D volumes, the system identifies and processes only candidate regions, reducing training time while maintaining detection accuracy through targeted analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive feature sets are used to improve classification performance, then detection accuracy improves, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent computes only the necessary features for each candidate region based on its specific characteristics and the detection stage. Instead of calculating all possible features uniformly across all regions, the system selectively computes features that are most relevant to the current classification task, reducing computational cost while maintaining classification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different feature sets and computational strategies to different regions based on their local characteristics. Candidate regions with higher object probability receive more comprehensive feature analysis, while low-probability regions use simplified feature sets, optimizing the balance between classification accuracy and computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If multiple classifiers are combined to improve detection performance, then classification accuracy increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent organizes multiple classifiers into a hierarchical structure with coarse classifiers at higher levels and fine classifiers at lower levels. This segmentation allows the system to use simpler classifiers for initial screening and progressively apply more complex classifiers only where needed, improving detection performance while managing system complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested classifier structure where simpler classifiers are embedded within more complex ones. The coarse classifiers serve as outer layers that filter data before it reaches inner fine classifiers, creating a nested architecture that improves detection performance through multiple layers of analysis while controlling complexity through hierarchical organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS7421415B2Methods and systems for 3D object detection using learning
Publication Date: 2008.09.02 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US7421415B2 patent drawing
  • US7421415B2 patent drawing
  • US7421415B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method of 3D object detection, a learning procedure is used for feature selection from a feature set based on an annotated image-volume database, generating a set of selected features. A classifier is built using a classification scheme to distinguish between an object location and a non-object location and using the set of selected features. The classifier is applied at a candidate volume to determine whether the candidate volume contains an object of interest.