3D Object Detection via 2D-3D Sensor Synergy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving methods for 3D object detection face challenges due to the reliance on LIDAR sensors, which have performance gaps, especially when generalizing to different datasets, and lack accuracy in providing depth information, leading to coarse detection results and sensitivity to appearance variations.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid approach that combines 3D object detection with 2D object detection, using multiple sensors to generate point clouds, transferring data to a Region Proposal Network (RPN), and integrating Region-based Convolutional Neural Networks (RCNN) for bounding box estimation, while enhancing 2D detection through instance segmentation and box consistency filtering to improve accuracy and reduce false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If LIDAR sensors are used for 3D object detection, then depth information and 3D structure capture are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth information accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines 2D object detection from camera images with 3D object detection from LIDAR point clouds into a unified detection system. The 2D detection results provide initial object proposals that guide the 3D detection process, merging the strengths of both modalities to achieve accurate depth information while reducing reliance on complex LIDAR-only processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces 2D object detection results as an intermediary element that bridges the gap between simple 2D image processing and complex 3D point cloud analysis. The 2D detection outcomes serve as proposals that filter and guide subsequent 3D detection, reducing the computational burden on the LIDAR processing pipeline

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If 2D object detection methods are used alone, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of 3D objects deteriorates due to lack of depth information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system simplicityVSAvoid3D detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D image space to 3D point cloud space by projecting 2D object detection results into 3D space. The 2D detection proposals are lifted to 3D bounding boxes using depth information from LIDAR, enabling accurate 3D object localization while maintaining the simplicity of 2D detection approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the object detection process into distinct 2D and 3D stages. The 2D detection phase identifies object candidates in image space, while the 3D detection phase refines these candidates in point cloud space. This segmentation allows each stage to specialize, maintaining simplicity where possible while achieving precision where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If pseudo-LIDAR is used as alternative to LIDAR, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and generalization performance worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor configurationVSAvoidgeneralization performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite detection system that combines 2D camera data with 3D LIDAR point clouds. This composite approach leverages the texture and color information from cameras alongside the accurate depth and spatial structure from LIDAR, achieving robust detection performance that generalizes well across different datasets and conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a more accurate and reliable 3D object detection system by leveraging both 2D and 3D object detection synergies, filtering noise, and improving performance across various datasets, enhancing the perception pipeline with consistent object detection from heterogeneous sensors.

Implementation Method 1

The most commonly used 3D sensors are Laser Imaging Detecting And Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, which generate 3D point clouds to capture 3D structures of the scenes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS12033393B23D object detection method using synergy of heterogeneous sensors for autonomous driving
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US12033393B2 patent drawing
  • US12033393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing object detection during autonomous driving includes: performing 3D object detection in a 3D object detection segment; uploading an output of multiple sensors in communication with the 3D object detection segment to multiple point clouds; transferring point cloud data from the multiple point clouds to a Region Proposal Network (RPN); independently performing 2D object detection in a 2D object detector in parallel with the 3D object detection in the 3D object detection segment; and taking a given input image and simultaneously learning box coordinates and class label probabilities in a 2D object detection network operating to treat object detection as a regression problem.