3D Object Detection Using Optical Flow ROI Histograms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automotive sensors struggle to accurately detect three-dimensional (3D) objects in various weather conditions and environments, as radar sensors are inadequate for angle estimation and boundary detection, video cameras degrade in bad weather, and ultrasonic sensors have limited range and accuracy, while deep learning algorithms and feature-based methods fail to identify objects of all shapes and sizes.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing semi-dense regular optical flow feature sets computes histograms of optical flow magnitudes (HOFM) and normalized optical flow gradients (HOFG) to differentiate 3D objects from flat features, employing hardware and software for low-latency decision making, and uses learning algorithms to classify objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If radar sensors are used for detecting 3D objects, then detection range is improved, but angle estimation and boundary detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidangle estimation and boundary detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines radar sensor data with video camera data to create a hybrid detection system. The radar provides detection range and motion information, while the video camera provides angle estimation and boundary detection. By merging these complementary data sources, the system achieves both long detection range and high measurement precision for angle and boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing system that fuses radar and video camera data. This intermediary layer processes and integrates information from both sensors, allowing the system to leverage the strengths of each sensor type while compensating for their individual weaknesses in angle estimation and boundary detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If video cameras are used for detecting 3D objects, then angle estimation and boundary detection accuracy is improved, but performance deteriorates in bad weather conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangle estimation and boundary detection accuracyVSAvoidperformance in bad weather
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges video camera data with radar sensor data to create a robust detection system. The video camera provides high-precision angle estimation and boundary detection in good conditions, while the radar provides reliable detection in bad weather. By combining these sources, the system maintains reliability across varying weather conditions while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the weighting and processing parameters of video camera data based on detected weather conditions. When bad weather is detected, the system reduces reliance on video camera data and increases reliance on radar data, thereby maintaining reliable performance while preserving angle estimation accuracy when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If ultrasonic sensors are used for detecting 3D objects, then short-range detection accuracy is improved, but detection range deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshort-range detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection range
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection space into short-range and long-range zones. Ultrasonic sensors are used for short-range detection where high precision is needed, while radar sensors handle long-range detection. This segmentation allows each sensor type to operate in its optimal range, achieving both high short-range accuracy and extended detection range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If deep learning algorithms are used for object detection, then object identification capability is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial deep learning processing by using traditional computer vision algorithms for initial object detection and classification, then applying deep learning only to ambiguous or critical cases. This partial application maintains good object identification capability while significantly reducing computational complexity compared to full deep learning processing of all detected objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

5Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are deployed to improve detection accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but system complexity and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges radar and video camera systems into a unified detection platform with shared processing resources. By combining these sensors and implementing data fusion algorithms, the system achieves high detection accuracy while managing complexity through integrated architecture rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250391039A1Three dimensional (3D) object detection
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20250391039A1 patent drawing
  • US20250391039A1 patent drawing
  • US20250391039A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying regions of interest (ROIs) includes receiving, by a processor from a video camera, a video image and computing, by the processor, an optical flow image, based on the video image. The method also includes computing, by the processor, a magnitude of optical flow image based on the video image and computing a histogram of optical flow magnitudes (HOFM) image for the video image based on the magnitude of optical flow image. Additionally, the method includes generating, by the processor, a mask indicating ROIs of the video image, based on the HOFM.