3D-Object Inspection With Parallel Classification and Quality Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In modern manufacturing facilities, efficiently identifying and assessing the quality of semi-finished products with different specifications is crucial for proper redirection and packaging, but existing methods often delay quality assessment until classification, affecting overall production efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A 3D-object identification and quality assessment system that provides simultaneous classification and quality evaluation using a facility with sensing devices, a database of reference feature vectors, and a comparator to generate correspondence indications, enabling parallel identification and quality assessment of 3D objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If quality assessment is performed after classification, then classification accuracy can be maintained, but production efficiency deteriorates due to sequential processing delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidtime delay in quality assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts quality assessment features and performs preliminary quality evaluation simultaneously with classification features extraction, rather than waiting until after classification. The quality assessment module processes objects in parallel with the classification module, enabling quality decisions to be made without delaying the classification workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines classification and quality assessment into a single integrated processing pipeline. Both functions share common feature extraction components and operate on the same input data simultaneously, merging two previously sequential operations into one parallel process that improves throughput without sacrificing either function's accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If multiple sensing devices and processing modules are added for parallel processing, then production efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multi-functional modules that can perform both classification and quality assessment tasks. The feature extraction modules and processing units are designed to serve dual purposes, reducing the need for completely separate dedicated hardware for each function and thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into modular functional blocks (sensing devices, feature extraction modules, classification module, quality assessment module) that can be independently configured and processed. This segmentation allows for scalable implementation where only necessary components are activated based on specific production needs, managing complexity through modularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250329138A13d-object identification and quality assessment
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 AM-FLOW HLDG BV
  • US20250329138A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329138A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329138A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A 3D-object identification and quality assessment system is described that includes an evaluation module that receives respective correspondence indications for each of object class and performs in a parallel manner: generating a class indication signal indicative for a most probable object class identified for the inspected 3D object; and generating a quality assessment signal indicating a value for an extent to which the inspected 3D object meets the quality requirements for the most probable one of the object classes. A 3D-object identification and quality assessment method, a 3D-object manufacturing system comprising the 3D-object identification and quality assessment system and a method of training a 3D-object identification and quality assessment system are also described.