3D Optical Acquisition for Artwork Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for authenticating three-dimensional objects lack the ability to accurately determine object uniqueness beyond two-dimensional imaging, particularly as 3D printing technology advances, leading to concerns in the art market regarding forgery and authenticity verification.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an optical acquisition device with a multi-aperture lens and optical detector array, 3D scanning mechanism, and patterned illumination, coupled with data post-processing software for latent representation transformation, category assignment, axial offset analysis, probe matching, and confidence analysis to establish a uniqueness score for three-dimensional objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard camera imaging is used, then two-dimensional images can be acquired, but three-dimensional optical information cannot be obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D optical information accuracyVSAvoid3D surface information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D camera imaging to 3D optical measurement by introducing axial scanning capability. The measurement device acquires optical information not only in the lateral dimensions (x, y) but also in the axial dimension (z), enabling full 3D surface characterization of artworks including depth, curvature, and topographical features that standard cameras cannot capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If a single aperture lens is used, then the device structure is simple, but the acquisition area is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement coverage areaVSAvoidlens array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a single large aperture into multiple smaller apertures arranged in an array. This segmentation allows each aperture to capture optical information from a specific region, and the combined data from all apertures provides comprehensive coverage of the entire artwork surface, effectively increasing the measurement area while maintaining manageable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If high-resolution patch examination is used, then detailed surface features can be observed, but the examination area is limited to small regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface feature resolutionVSAvoidexamined area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-aperture lens array enables simultaneous high-resolution examination of multiple surface patches across the entire artwork. Each aperture focuses on a specific region with high precision, while the array configuration ensures that collectively all apertures cover the complete surface area, achieving both detailed resolution and comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the optical information captured by multiple apertures into a unified 3D dataset. By combining the high-resolution measurements from each aperture's focal region, the system reconstructs the complete artwork surface with both detailed surface features and full-area coverage, eliminating the trade-off between resolution and area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If passive observation methods are used, then the object is not damaged, but the authentication capability is insufficient for 3D objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoid3D object measurement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances passive observation by adding 3D measurement capability through axial scanning. The system maintains non-contact, damage-free observation while acquiring depth and topographical information in the axial dimension, enabling reliable authentication of 3D objects such as sculptures and relief artworks that require volumetric rather than just surface imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid acquisition and processing of optical data from the entire surface of 3D objects, providing a tunable confidence level for determining object uniqueness, effectively addressing the challenge of authenticating three-dimensional objects and preventing forgery.

Implementation Method 1

Optical measurements consist of the measurement of any radiation extending from ultraviolet (200 nm wavelength) to the near infrared (3 μm wavelength). Measurement here implies the conversion of optical radiation into an electrical signal that is digitized for subsequent processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

Each lens focuses radiation onto the optical detector array, to form what we term a micro-camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLens focusing: Lens

Data Source

PatentUS12061733B2Optical acquisition system and probing method for object matching
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 MICROSCOPIC IMAGE RECOGNITION ALGORITHMS INC
  • US12061733B2 patent drawing
  • US12061733B2 patent drawing
  • US12061733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention presents a system and method to acquire object measurements with and optical device and axial scanning mechanism, and to subsequently implement a digital processing algorithm to establish a match between similar object measurements acquired in the past. The digital processing algorithm consists of a probe-and-match strategy. It is generally challenging to determine whether or not an object, such as a work of art (e.g., a painting, drawing, sculpture, or collectable item), is the exact same object as something viewed previously with an extremely high degree of confidence. There is the potential for one object to look very similar to another object, but not be the same (i.e., to be a forgery). There is also the potential for one object to be the same object as viewed previously, but have changed significantly over time (e.g., aged or damaged). Being able to distinguish between these two cases is a difficult yet important task. This invention aims to address the challenge of identifying object uniqueness by considering it as a matching problem between optical measurements, wherein multiple acquired measurements from many objects must be sifted through to establish how similar they are, if at all, to any new measurements.