3D Power Control Panel Assembly With Simulated Wiring Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control panel production methods suffer from errors and inefficiencies due to inadequate reflection of designer intent, inconsistency in design drawings, and reliance on paper-based information, leading to increased design time, quality degradation, and safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A production support method and system that generates standardized component data, integrates 2D and 3D component symbols for design, simulates wiring paths, and automates production by applying verified production data to interlocking production facilities, ensuring accurate and consistent assembly processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If paper drawing information is used for production, then workers can access design information, but human errors occur due to arbitrary interpretation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign information transmissionVSAvoidproduction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a 3D digital copy of the control panel that precisely replicates all design information, component positions, and wiring details. This digital model serves as the single source of truth for production, eliminating arbitrary interpretation of paper drawings while maintaining complete design information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from 2D paper drawings to a 3D digital model, adding spatial dimensionality and depth to the design information. This 3D representation provides intuitive spatial relationships and precise component positioning that cannot be adequately conveyed in 2D, thereby reducing interpretation errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If classic graphic-based CAD design is used, then design work can be completed, but engineering information required for production is not sufficiently reflected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign completion efficiencyVSAvoidengineering information for production
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the 2D circuit design with 3D spatial arrangement and assembly process information into a single integrated 3D model. This combination ensures that all engineering information needed for production - including component positions, wiring paths, and assembly sequences - is captured in the design phase without requiring separate documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D digital model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as the design representation, the production instruction guide, the assembly verification tool, and the source for generating all production data. This multi-functionality eliminates information loss between design and production stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If design drawings are created by different designers with different drawing expression methods, then individual design styles are maintained, but consistency of design drawings is not secured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesigner flexibilityVSAvoiddesign drawing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enforces homogeneous representation of all design information within the standardized 3D model structure. All designers work within the same 3D environment with consistent rules for component placement, wiring representation, and annotation, ensuring uniformity across all designs while maintaining the ability to represent diverse control panel configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Adaptability or versatility

If non-automated manpower-oriented manufacturing process is used, then production flexibility is maintained, but poor working conditions and safety accidents occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction flexibilityVSAvoidsafety risks and poor working conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary verification of the entire production process through virtual simulation in the 3D model before actual manufacturing. Wiring paths, component positions, and assembly sequences are validated in advance, identifying and resolving potential safety issues and working condition problems before workers encounter them on the production floor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11979004B2Production support method and system for power control panel production automation
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 END ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US11979004B2 patent drawing
  • US11979004B2 patent drawing
  • US11979004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention proposes a production support method and system for power control panel production automation, which enable an intention of a designer to be sufficiently reflected on a production site and an error occurred during production to be minimized and, in particular, includes the steps of: realizing, in a virtual environment, a power control panel designed in a 3D type and verifying an error by simulating wiring path information of designed components and electronic units; extracting production data for each process, including component information for each process, component and electronic unit arrangement information, assembly process information, and wiring information, by collecting information distributed to support production automation of the power control panel designed in the 3D type, which has been verified; and automating production by applying the production data to each interworking production facility to support the production automation of the power control panel.