3D Replacement Part Files With Built-In Design Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The traditional supply chain and logistics for manufacturing and replacing components are inefficient, especially in remote or resource-constrained environments, leading to high costs and prolonged downtime due to the need for engineering involvement and complex logistics, and existing 3-D printing technologies lack a system for dynamic configuration and real-time design validation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for dynamically configuring 3-D object files using a graphical user interface, allowing technicians to select generic components and input specific parameters, which are checked against engineering best practices to ensure safety and manufacturability, enabling on-site additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional supply chain and logistics are used for component manufacturing and replacement, then engineering support and design validation are ensured, but production time and logistics complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign integrityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service manufacturing by providing field technicians with autonomous access to a database of validated component designs and manufacturing parameters. Technicians can independently configure and produce replacement parts without requiring engineering support team involvement, thereby maintaining design integrity through pre-validat ed designs while eliminating time-consuming approval workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Engineering designs and manufacturing parameters are pre-configured and stored in a database before field deployment. This preliminary action allows field technicians to directly access and utilize already-validated designs, eliminating the need for real-time engineering review and approval, thus reducing production time while ensuring design reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If engineering support teams are involved in every design change or issue, then design quality is maintained, but work progress slows down significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidwork progress
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments design authority into two levels: (1) Engineering teams perform comprehensive validation and store approved designs in the database; (2) Field technicians execute manufacturing using pre-validated designs. This segmentation allows engineers to focus on quality assurance of design templates while technicians achieve rapid production, thereby maintaining design quality without slowing work progress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The database of pre-configured designs and manufacturing parameters acts as an intermediary between engineering teams and field technicians. Instead of direct communication for every design issue, the database mediates by providing technicians with access to already-validated designs, maintaining design quality through engineering-prepared templates while enabling independent, rapid production in the field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If individual parts are produced in low quantities, then customization to specific system variations is possible, but individual part cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidindividual part cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables cost-effective customization by allowing technicians to modify design parameters (dimensions, materials, configurations) of pre-validated base designs to match specific system variations. This parameter-based customization approach maintains adaptability to unique field requirements while leveraging the efficiency of standardized design templates, thereby reducing individual part costs compared to entirely custom design and manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If 3-D printing is used for on-site manufacturing, then logistics complexity is reduced, but lack of dynamic configuration capability limits effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogistics complexityVSAvoiddynamic configuration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamic configuration capability to 3-D printing by providing technicians with software tools to modify design parameters, select materials, and adjust manufacturing settings based on specific field requirements. This transforms static 3-D printing into a dynamic, adaptive manufacturing solution that can respond to unique system variations while maintaining the logistics benefits of on-site production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where technicians can input specific system variation data and receive automatically adjusted manufacturing parameters and design configurations. This feedback loop enables the 3-D printing system to adapt dynamically to field conditions while maintaining design integrity, thereby enhancing versatility without compromising the simplified logistics of on-site manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12499494B2Dynamically creating three-dimensional object files for components needing to be replaced at point of need
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 KAIROS INC
  • US12499494B2 patent drawing
  • US12499494B2 patent drawing
  • US12499494B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for dynamically generating object files for a component that needs to be replaced at time and location the component is needed. An operator can navigate a graphical user interface to select generic component types, representative of the overall component, and then generic configuration sub-types of the component. The operator is then able to input parameters to customize the component to their specific application. Design checking algorithms confirm the inputs are below predefined risk thresholds before generating the file for the component. The system enables less skilled operators (no computer aided design experience required) to create custom parts, while mitigating potential design risk. The object files (e.g., 3D object files) are then seamlessly sent to a 3-D printer's slicing algorithm and prepared for manufacture. The operator can then make the custom part when ready.