3D Part Quality Prediction Using In-Process Sensing Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing technologies lack real-time quality prediction and adaptive control mechanisms, leading to potential issues in the formation of parts with suboptimal quality, such as mechanical strength or color deviations, which can result in defective products.

Innovation Solution

A computing apparatus and method that utilizes sensing devices to predict the quality of 3D printed parts by accessing formation conditions and adjusting 3D printer operations, such as fusing agent application and radiation, to modify the printing process automatically or alert the user to intervene, ensuring the quality meets predefined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional 3D printing processes are used without real-time monitoring, then the printing process is simple and fast, but the part quality cannot be ensured and defects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidprinting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting part quality before the printing process completes, using sensed formation conditions and stored correlation data to determine quality outcomes in advance, allowing preventive measures to be taken before defects occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously sensing formation conditions during printing, comparing predicted quality against thresholds, and automatically adjusting printing parameters or alerting users to maintain quality within acceptable ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time quality prediction and automatic adjustment mechanisms are implemented, then part quality and reliability are improved, but the device complexity and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct reliabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically sensing formation conditions, predicting quality outcomes, and adjusting printing parameters without requiring continuous user intervention, making the complex quality control processes transparent to the operator

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops that automatically monitor printing conditions and adjust parameters in real-time, reducing the need for manual monitoring and intervention while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11364685B2Predicting quality of a 3D object part
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US11364685B2 patent drawing
  • US11364685B2 patent drawing
  • US11364685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an example, a computing apparatus may include a processing device and a machine readable storage medium on which is stored instructions that when executed by the processing device, cause the processing device to access, from a sensing device, information pertaining to formation of a part of a 3D object in a layer of build materials upon which fusing agent droplets have been or are to be selectively deposited. The instructions may also cause the processing device to predict, based upon the accessed information, a quality of the part and output an indication of the predicted quality of the part.