3D Part Arrangement Using Thermal Decoupling Build Layouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3D manufacturing, additive processes face challenges with thermal energy management, such as energy imbalance and thermal coupling, which can lead to over-fusion and poor quality parts due to 'thermal bleeding' during the fabrication of multiple parts within a shared build envelope.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining an optimal arrangement of parts using multiple levels of descriptions, starting with less complex cuboid bounding boxes and progressing to more complex ellipsoid convex hulls and computer-aided designs, to maximize part density while maintaining thermal decoupling spaces, using optimization algorithms like genetic algorithms to avoid undesirable thermal locations and minimize computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple parts are fabricated concurrently within a shared build envelope, then productivity is improved, but thermal coupling causes thermal bleeding leading to over-fusion and manufacturing precision deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidquality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by determining thermal characteristics for different locations within the build envelope and arranging parts based on these location-specific thermal properties. The system identifies regions with favorable thermal characteristics (lower thermal bleeding) and places parts accordingly, while avoiding regions with unfavorable thermal characteristics. This localized approach to thermal management allows multiple parts to be fabricated concurrently while maintaining quality by addressing thermal coupling effects at each specific location rather than applying a uniform arrangement strategy throughout the entire build envelope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If parts are arranged closely to maximize build envelope utilization, then productivity is improved, but thermal bleeding increases causing energy imbalance and material degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart densityVSAvoidthermal energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting part arrangements based on thermal characteristics of different locations within the build envelope. The system modifies arrangement parameters (positions, orientations, spacing) according to location-specific thermal properties, allowing parts to be placed closer together in regions with favorable thermal characteristics while maintaining appropriate spacing in regions with unfavorable thermal characteristics. This adaptive parameter adjustment optimizes part density while managing thermal energy and preventing excessive thermal bleeding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If complex optimization algorithms are used to determine optimal part arrangements, then manufacturing precision is improved, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrangement optimizationVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-determining thermal characteristics for various locations within the build envelope before performing part arrangement optimization. The system calculates and stores thermal properties (such as thermal bleeding tendencies, energy imbalance risks) for different regions in advance, then uses this pre-computed thermal map to guide part placement decisions. This preliminary thermal analysis enables faster optimization iterations, as subsequent arrangement calculations can reference pre-established thermal characteristics rather than recalculating thermal fields for each arrangement iteration, thereby reducing computational time while maintaining optimization quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for efficient and high-quality fabrication of multiple parts within a shared build envelope by optimizing thermal management, reducing material degradation, and minimizing computational time, thereby enhancing throughput and yield.

Implementation Method 1

heat is applied to build material particles located in selected areas such that those selectively located build material particles melt and fuse together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

build material particles melt and fuse together to form a section of a 3D fabricated part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFusion: Nuclear Fusion

Implementation Method 3

Some of the applied heat may bleed out to other build material particles that are outside of, e.g., adjacent to, the build material particles located in the selected areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS11335074B2Arrangement determination for 3D fabricated parts
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 PERIDOT PRINT LLC
  • US11335074B2 patent drawing
  • US11335074B2 patent drawing
  • US11335074B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an example, an apparatus may include a memory that may store instructions to cause a processor to generate, for each part to be fabricated in a build envelope of a 3D fabricating device, first level descriptions and second level descriptions for the part. The processor may determine, using the first level descriptions, whether there is an arrangement that results in the parts jointly fitting within the build envelope while providing certain thermal decoupling spaces between the parts. In response to a determination that the arrangement using the first level descriptions for the parts has not been determined, the processor may determine, using the second level descriptions, whether there is an arrangement that results in the parts jointly fitting within the build envelope while providing the certain thermal decoupling spaces.