3D Physical Handset for Surgical Table Control with Force Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handsets for controlling surgical operating tables are cumbersome and difficult to use, lacking ergonomic design and providing inadequate visual, audible, or touch feedback, making it challenging for healthcare operators to select and control desired movements accurately and safely.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional physical representation of a surgical operating table with sensors and a control system that generates output control signals in response to touch or movement inputs, providing visual feedback through illumination and allowing for precise control of table movements via a trigger mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a handset with many push buttons and icons is provided to control all movement functions, then the control capability is comprehensive, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in searching and selecting buttons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a three-dimensional physical copy of the surgical table tabletop structure within the handset. This copy includes segmented representations (head section, torso sections, pelvis section, leg sections) that mirror the actual table's anatomy. Users interact with this physical model by applying force or movement to the relevant section, which directly translates to controlling the corresponding table segment, eliminating the need to search through numerous buttons and icons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The handset's physical representation is divided into multiple independent sections corresponding to the surgical table's segments. Each section (head, torso, pelvis, legs) can be independently manipulated. This segmentation allows users to control specific areas of the table without being overwhelmed by a unified complex control interface, improving both versatility and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If small push buttons with manufacturer icons are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability deteriorates due to difficulty in reading and correct interpretation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using abstract icons and text labels that require interpretation, the patent creates a direct physical copy of the table structure in the handset. The spatial arrangement and segmentation of the physical model intuitively represent the actual table configuration, eliminating ambiguity and misinterpretation risks associated with small text and manufacturer-specific icons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If manual pressing of buttons is used to activate movements, then the ease of operation is simple, but the reliability deteriorates due to lack of visual, audible or touch feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates multiple feedback mechanisms: visual feedback through illumination devices (such as LEDs) that light up to confirm button selection and provide status information, and force feedback through the physical model itself where users can feel resistance or movement corresponding to the table's actual position and state. This multi-sensory feedback ensures users can verify their commands were correctly received and executed, improving reliability while maintaining simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If a compact array of push buttons is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ease of operation worsens due to difficulty in selecting buttons accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional array of buttons to a three-dimensional physical model. Users can apply force in multiple directions (pushing, pulling, rotating) on different sections of the physical model, adding spatial and mechanical dimensions to the control interface. This dimensional expansion provides more intuitive and accurate control while maintaining a compact form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

5Device complexity

If push buttons are used without feedback mechanisms, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability deteriorates due to possibility of inadvertent pressing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates illumination devices that provide immediate visual feedback when a section is selected or activated. This feedback mechanism allows users to verify their intended action before execution and to detect inadvertent selections. The system can also provide feedback about the table's current state, enabling users to confirm that movements are occurring as expected, thereby preventing safety issues from unnoticed incorrect operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ergonomic design simplifies the user interface, reduces the risk of accidental movements, and allows for precise control of table movements with visual feedback, enhancing safety and efficiency in a medical environment.

Implementation Method 1

a respective sensor arranged to sense a force or movement applied to a surface of the respective section by a touch applied to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing:

Implementation Method 2

The illumination device may be a light emitting diode and may provide a visual feedback when the sensor senses the applied force or movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentEP3768211B1Handset for controlling a surgical operating table
Publication Date: 2023.11.08 STERIS SOLUTIONS LIMITED
  • EP3768211B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3768211B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3768211B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A handset for controlling a surgical operating table, the handset comprising a three-dimensional physical representation of a tabletop of a surgical operating table, the physical representation of the tabletop comprising a back section, a seat section and one or more leg sections, wherein at least one of the sections includes a respective sensor arranged to sense a force or movement applied to a surface of the respective section by a touch applied to the surface, and a control system within the handset which is connected to the sensor, the control system being arranged to generate an output control signal for transmission to the surgical operating table to be controlled in response to an input command of an applied force or applied movement sensed by the respective sensor. Methods of controlling a tabletop of a surgical operating table using the handset are also disclosed.