3D Print Geometry Compensation Using ML Deviation Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing processes often result in deviations from the intended object geometry due to overcuring, resin contamination, and post-processing conditions like centrifugation forces and solvent washes, affecting the dimensional accuracy and functionality of printed objects, particularly dental appliances.

Innovation Solution

A method using machine learning algorithms, such as convolutional neural networks, to predict and compensate for these deviations by modifying fabrication instructions to ensure the actual geometry conforms more closely to the target geometry, incorporating techniques like vat photopolymerization, high temperature lithography, and various post-processing steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to create objects layer-by-layer, then manufacturing flexibility and complexity are improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to overcuring and resin contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting manufacturing deviations before actual production using machine learning models trained on historical data. The ML algorithm analyzes process parameters and predicts geometric deviations, allowing pre-compensation to be applied to the digital model before manufacturing begins, thus preventing accuracy issues rather than correcting them afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using historical manufacturing data and actual measurement results to continuously train and improve the machine learning model. The predicted deviations are compared with actual outcomes, and this feedback loop refines the prediction accuracy over time, enabling better compensation strategies for maintaining dimensional precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If post-processing steps like centrifugation and solvent washes are applied, then object cleanliness is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to warping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresin contaminationVSAvoidgeometric accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system predicts the warping effects that will occur during post-processing steps before they happen. By analyzing process parameters and using ML models trained on historical post-processing data, the system pre-compensates for expected geometric changes, adjusting the digital model in advance to counteract the anticipated warping from centrifugation and solvent washes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by intentionally modifying the digital model in the opposite direction of expected post-processing deformation. The ML-predicted warping patterns are used to create compensatory adjustments that counterbalance the harmful effects of centrifugation forces and solvent exposure, ensuring the final object achieves the desired geometry despite undergoing these necessary cleaning processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Productivity

If manufacturing processes are simplified without prediction, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidgeometric accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling the manufacturing process to automatically predict and compensate for its own deviations using integrated machine learning models. The system uses its own historical data and real-time process parameters to self-correct geometric inaccuracies without requiring external intervention or complex manual adjustments, thus maintaining both efficiency and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical measurement and adjustment systems with intelligent software-based prediction and compensation. Instead of using elaborate physical fixtures and manual measurement tools to ensure accuracy, the system uses ML algorithms to predict deviations and automatically adjusts the digital model, substituting mechanical complexity with computational intelligence to maintain precision while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves manufacturing accuracy and reduces time and material waste by predicting and adjusting for deviations in additive manufacturing and post-processing, ensuring dental appliances fit properly and function as intended.

Implementation Method 1

generating at least one modified image by inputting the at least one image into a machine learning algorithm. The machine learning algorithm can be trained to determine one or more modifications to the at least one image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMachine learning/Convolutional neural network:

Implementation Method 2

incorporating techniques like vat photopolymerization, high temperature lithography

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 3

incorporating techniques like vat photopolymerization, high temperature lithography

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal curing: Heating

Implementation Method 4

post-processing conditions as centrifugation forces, heating, and solvent washes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 5

post-processing conditions as centrifugation forces, heating, and solvent washes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal treatment: Heating

Implementation Method 6

post-processing conditions as centrifugation forces, heating, and solvent washes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvent extraction: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS20250222655A1Predicting manufacturing outcomes for additively manufactured objects
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 ALIGN TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250222655A1 patent drawing
  • US20250222655A1 patent drawing
  • US20250222655A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for predicting manufacturing outcomes are provided. In some embodiments, a method includes receiving at least one image representing a target geometry of an object to be fabricated using an additive manufacturing process. The method can include generating at least one modified image by inputting the at least one image into a machine learning algorithm. The machine learning algorithm can be trained to determine one or more modifications to the at least one image, where the one or modifications are configured to compensate for predicted deviations from the target geometry of the object when the object is fabricated via the additive manufacturing process based on the at least one image. The method can further include generating instructions for fabricating the object using the additive manufacturing process, based on the at least one modified image.