3D Print Object Modeling With Halftone Control for Material Properties

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing techniques face challenges in generating three-dimensional objects with specific properties such as conductivity, density, and appearance, as they often require complex control data and halftoning processes to achieve desired object attributes, which can be limiting in terms of material selection and halftone schemes available.

Innovation Solution

The method involves defining print material data and using halftoning techniques to determine the location and amount of print materials needed to achieve specified object properties, with the option to select from various halftone schemes and print apparatus settings, allowing for the generation of control data that can produce objects with varied properties like conductivity, density, and appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If halftoning techniques are used to achieve desired object attributes, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject attribute precisionVSAvoidhalftoning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying print material coverage percentages and utilizing different halftone schemes (error diffusion, ordered dithering, attributed dithering) to achieve desired object attributes. By changing the parameters of material distribution and halftoning algorithms, the system can precisely control properties like color, density, and conductivity without requiring complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple print materials are used to achieve varied object properties, then adaptability is improved, but loss of substance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject property varietyVSAvoidprint material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different print materials to different regions or voxels of the three-dimensional object based on desired local properties. Each voxel can have customized material composition and coverage percentages, allowing precise control over local attributes like color, conductivity, or density while minimizing overall material waste through optimized distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by applying print materials at controlled coverage percentages rather than full coverage. By specifying that only certain percentages of voxels receive particular materials (e.g., 70% coverage of a conductive material), the system achieves the desired object properties with reduced material consumption compared to complete saturation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If complex control data is generated to achieve specific object properties, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject property controlVSAvoidobject generation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing halftone threshold matrices and print material coverage representations before actual object generation. These pre-computed data structures enable rapid conversion of three-dimensional data into control data during printing, reducing real-time computational burden and improving productivity while maintaining precise control over object properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of three-dimensional objects with precise properties by determining the optimal placement and amount of print materials, reducing frustration and waste while fully utilizing the capabilities of the print apparatus, and allowing for the generation of objects with complex attributes like color, transparency, and mechanical properties.

Implementation Method 1

Energy may be applied to the layer and the build material to which an agent has been applied may coalesce and solidify upon cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentEP3230809B1Method for generating three dimensional object models for an additive manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2023.03.15 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • EP3230809B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3230809B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The application refers to a method for generating three-dimensional object models for an additive manufacturing process in a layer-by-layer manner, e.g. 3D-printing, and to generating control data for use by the print apparatus. The object models are generated from a geometric description and from object generation data, which comprise the print apparatus and attributes such as a halftone scheme, a print apparatus setting, an object structure and a print material coverage representation. The method is implemented in the form of a computer software product and generates data specific for each identifies printing device.