3D Print Packing Layout Using Reduced-Resolution Model Files

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass production 3D printing systems face challenges in loading and processing large numbers of objects due to memory and processing limitations, leading to inefficient auto-packing and visualization issues, which hinder optimized configuration and practical display of packing arrangements.

Innovation Solution

The use of reduced resolution 3D model files for generating and visualizing packing arrangements, allowing for smaller file sizes that require less computing and memory resources, enabling efficient determination and display of packing arrangements for multiple objects while considering thermal considerations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If full resolution 3D model files are used for packing arrangement determination, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but memory usage and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel file resolutionVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the 3D model data into two distinct representations: a high-resolution model for final manufacturing and a low-resolution model for packing arrangement determination. This segmentation allows the system to use only the necessary resolution level for each specific task, thereby reducing memory usage during packing operations while preserving manufacturing precision when it is ultimately needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the resolution parameter of the 3D model files based on the operational context. For packing determination, the system uses low-resolution models with reduced geometric detail, while for actual manufacturing, it switches to high-resolution models. This dynamic parameter adjustment optimizes computational resources without compromising final product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If full resolution 3D model files are used for visualization, then visualization precision is improved, but processing time and computational intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments visualization requirements into two stages: preliminary packing arrangement visualization using low-resolution models for rapid display and manipulation, and final detailed visualization using high-resolution models only when necessary. This staged approach significantly reduces processing time during iterative packing operations while maintaining visualization precision when final confirmation is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by providing just sufficient visualization detail for each operational stage. During packing determination and manipulation, low-resolution visualization is sufficient and is used instead of full-resolution rendering. This partial visualization approach eliminates unnecessary computational overhead while maintaining adequate visual information for operational decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If a large number of objects are loaded into memory for packing optimization, then productivity increases, but memory capacity requirements exceed practical limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of objects processedVSAvoidmemory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the object data representation based on operational needs. By using low-resolution models for the majority of objects during packing determination, the system can load and process a significantly larger number of objects within available memory capacity. High-resolution data is reserved only for the final manufacturing stage, enabling scalable processing of large object quantities without exceeding practical memory limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3756168B1Packing arrangement determination for 3D printing of objects
Publication Date: 2023.11.08 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • EP3756168B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3756168B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3756168B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

According to examples, an apparatus may include a processor and a memory on which is stored machine readable instructions that when executed by the processor are to cause the processor to access a reduced resolution three-dimensional (3D) model file of an object to be built in a build bed of a 3D printing system, the reduced resolution 3D model file comprising a reduced resolution file of a first resolution 3D model file of the object. The instructions may also cause the processor to determine a packing arrangement for the object and a plurality of other objects to be built in the build bed through use of the reduced resolution 3D model file and output the determined packing arrangement for the 3D printing system to print the object and the other objects.