3D Printer In-Process Sensor Verification of Print Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing technologies lack efficient in-process non-destructive testing methods to validate print parameters, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies in verifying the implementation of selected print/process parameters in the printed object.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a sensor set integrated with a 3D printer to perform in-process testing, including sensors like laser scanners, cameras, and ultrasonic sensors to monitor and verify print parameters such as fiber placement, infill density, and external feature insertion during the printing operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If post-production analysis (destructive testing or X-ray examination) is applied to validate printing operations, then the ability to detect printing defects is improved, but the time required and material waste increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of printing defectsVSAvoidtime required for analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements in-process testing during the printing operation itself, rather than waiting for post-production analysis. Sensors monitor printing parameters (temperature, extrusion rate, layer height) in real-time, allowing defects to be detected and addressed during printing, thereby reducing time and material waste associated with post-production testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors printing parameters through sensors and provides real-time feedback to the control system. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of printing parameters and immediate detection of deviations from specified tolerances, eliminating the need for time-consuming post-production analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If post-production analysis is used to validate printing operations, then the ability to detect printing defects is improved, but material waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of printing defectsVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By performing testing during the printing process rather than after production, the system can identify and correct defects before they result in wasted material. This preliminary detection and correction capability significantly reduces material waste compared to post-production analysis methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If in-process non-destructive testing is implemented, then the need for destructive testing is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation of print parametersVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple sensing functions into a unified in-process testing system that can monitor various printing parameters (temperature, extrusion rate, layer height, dimensional accuracy) using a single integrated sensor array and control system, thereby managing complexity while achieving comprehensive validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The printing system performs self-validation through integrated sensors that monitor its own operation. The system tests itself during printing without requiring external destructive testing equipment, using embedded sensors to verify print parameters and detect defects in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time validation of print parameters, reducing material waste and time by ensuring accurate and precise printing without destructive or costly post-print testing, thereby improving the fidelity and reliability of 3D printed objects.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor set 200 may include a laser scanner 15

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser scanning: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS12629894B2Apparatus and method for performing in-process testing for verification of print parameters in a 3D printing apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 MARKFORGED INC
  • US12629894B2 patent drawing
  • US12629894B2 patent drawing
  • US12629894B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A 3D printing apparatus and method confirms that one or more print parameters was satisfied in the printing of a 3D object. Sensor readings are obtained during the printing of the 3D object. Based on sensor data corresponding to the sensor readings, a confirmation is made as to whether the one or more print parameters was satisfied in the printing of the 3D object.