3D Printed Object Authentication Using Spectroscopic Taggants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for authenticating 3D-printed products are insufficient to prevent counterfeiting, as they either rely on authorization codes that lack traceability or visible marks that can be easily obscured, and using authorized materials alone does not prevent unauthorized copying.

Innovation Solution

The use of chemical taggants or formula variations in 3D printing, detectable via spectroscopy, to create a fingerprint within the printed object, ensuring authenticity through non-destructive analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods (holograms, RFID tags, serial numbers) are used, then product authentication capability is provided, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase, and integration into 3D printed objects becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the authentication function directly into the 3D printing process by incorporating spectroscopically detectable materials (taggants) into the printing material itself. This eliminates the need for separate authentication components like holograms or RFID tags, as the authentication capability becomes an intrinsic property of the printed object's material composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The printing material serves multiple functions: it provides the structural function of the printed object while simultaneously containing spectroscopically detectable taggants for authentication. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components and simplifies the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If spectroscopically detectable materials are added to 3D printing material, then authentication detectability is improved, but material composition compatibility and structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication detectabilityVSAvoidmaterial composition compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates spectroscopically detectable materials (taggants) at specific local concentrations within the printing material composition. These taggants are embedded in controlled amounts within the bulk material, allowing them to provide strong spectroscopic signals without compromising the overall material properties or requiring complete replacement of the base printing material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite printing materials that combine the base printing material with spectroscopically detectable taggants. This composite approach allows the material to maintain the structural and functional properties needed for 3D printing while incorporating authentication capabilities through the added taggant components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If authentication features are integrated into the product design, then counterfeiting prevention is enhanced, but product aesthetics and design flexibility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeiting preventionVSAvoidproduct aesthetics
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the authentication function from visible surface features and embeds it within the material composition itself. The spectroscopically detectable taggants are incorporated into the bulk material rather than being applied as visible coatings or attachments, making authentication invisible to the naked eye while maintaining product aesthetics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical or visual authentication features (such as holograms, embossing, or visible tags) with a spectroscopic detection system. This substitution allows authentication to occur through chemical composition analysis rather than visual inspection, eliminating the need for aesthetic-compromising physical features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides rapid, convenient, and cost-effective authentication of 3D-printed products by leveraging spectroscopic detection of hidden chemical markers, enhancing brand protection and public safety.

Implementation Method 1

its authenticity can be monitored later using a spectrometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpectroscopy: Absorption Spectroscopy

Data Source

PatentEP4253003B1Apparatus for additive manufacturing with respect to a work piece
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 VERRANA
  • EP4253003B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4253003B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4253003B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention pertains to the use of sophisticated chemical formulation and spectroscopic design methods to select taggants compatible with the 3D print medium that are easily detected spectroscopically but otherwise compatible with the product, structural integrity and stability, and aesthetics. A spectral pattern employs a different chemical or combination of chemicals to alter the formulation of all or some portion of the printed object so that its authenticity can be monitored later using a spectrometer.