3D Printed Eyewear Frame with Integrated Crossed-Spring Hinge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional eyewear designs are delicate, require sophisticated tools for repair, and often feature multiple fasteners that can back out, leading to durability issues and the need for professional repairs, while 3D printed eyewear faces challenges with stress and wear due to limited elastic materials.

Innovation Solution

The integration of crossed-spring hinge assemblies within 3D printed eyewear frames, eliminating the need for screws or bolts and allowing for durable flexibility, comfortable fit, and easy folding, with the hinges made from the same material as the frame using 3D printing technology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional hinges with multiple fasteners (screws, pins, bolts) are used to attach temples to the frame, then the eyewear can be assembled with conventional manufacturing methods, but the fasteners may back out after extended wear, requiring professional repair tools and custom parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconventional manufacturing methodsVSAvoidfastener retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the hinge and temple components into a single integrated 3D-printed structure, eliminating separate fasteners (screws, pins, bolts) that were previously used to attach temples to the frame. This integration resolves the technical contradiction by maintaining ease of manufacture through additive manufacturing while eliminating fastener back-out issues entirely, as there are no separate fasteners to loosen or fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the fastener subsystem (screws, pins, bolts, and their associated assembly/disassembly operations) from the eyewear structure. By removing these problematic components entirely and replacing them with an integrated 3D-printed hinge-temple assembly, the invention resolves the contradiction between ease of manufacture and fastener retention reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If multiple separate components and fasteners are used in eyewear design, then assembly is possible with conventional methods, but repair requires sophisticated tools, custom parts, and professional optician services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly capabilityVSAvoidrepair complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate components (hinge, temple, and mounting structure) into a single integrated 3D-printed unit. This merger eliminates the need for sophisticated repair tools and custom parts, as the integrated structure can be easily replaced or reprinted if damaged, resolving the contradiction between assembly capability and repair complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If eyewear components are made from conventional materials, then structural strength is achieved, but customization for individual users is difficult, expensive, or impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiduser customization
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes 3D printing technology to enable parameter changes in eyewear design, allowing customization of temple length, angle, and shape for individual users while maintaining structural strength through controlled material deposition and inflection point design. This resolves the contradiction between structural strength and user customization by enabling variable geometry optimization for each user's anatomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If 3D printed materials with limited elasticity are used for eyewear frames, then manufacturing flexibility and customization are improved, but stress distribution and durability under repeated use are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoiddurability under stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary action by designing built-in inflection points and stress-distributing geometries into the 3D-printed frame structure before use. These pre-engineered features prepare the material to handle stress and repetition by directing forces through optimal pathways, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing flexibility and durability under stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by combining 3D-printed polymer materials with strategically designed geometric structures (inflection points, cross-section variations) to create a composite system that achieves both manufacturing flexibility and durability. The geometric complexity compensates for material limitations, enabling stress distribution and repeated use durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10394050B23D printed eyewear frame with integrated hinge and methods of manufacture
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 MATERIALISE NV
  • US10394050B2 patent drawing
  • US10394050B2 patent drawing
  • US10394050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a 3D printed eyewear frame having an integrated hinge. Advantageously, the integrated hinge assembly is a crossed spring hinge. Methods of manufacturing a 3D printed eyewear frame are likewise provided.