3D-Printed Fuel Fitting Geometry for Smoother Flow and Lower Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid elbow fittings require complex casting and machining processes, leading to material waste, long lead times, and suboptimal 90° deflection angles, resulting in heavier and more costly parts with single-point failure risks in drain tubes.

Innovation Solution

A redundant wall fluid deflection fitting with a first and second flange, continuous curved drain tubes, reinforcement gussets, and attachment lugs, manufactured using Selective Laser Melting (SLM) additive manufacturing, allowing for a 30% weight reduction and improved fuel flow efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional casting and machining processes are used to manufacture fluid elbow fittings, then the fittings can be produced with standard geometries, but the process requires extensive machining steps, results in material waste, and produces heavier parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidfitting weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from traditional subtractive manufacturing to additive manufacturing, fundamentally changing the manufacturing approach. This enables complex geometries with optimized wall thicknesses and integrated features that reduce material usage and part weight while eliminating extensive machining steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fitting design segments the structure into functional zones with varying wall thicknesses - thicker walls where structurally necessary and thinner walls where fluid flow is prioritized. This segmentation allows weight reduction in non-critical areas while maintaining strength where required, achieving lighter parts without compromising structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Shape

If complex casting processes are used to achieve required geometries, then the fittings can be manufactured, but the casting complexities and extensive machining steps increase lead times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting geometryVSAvoidmanufacturing lead time
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple manufacturing operations into a single additive manufacturing process. Features that previously required separate casting, machining, drilling, and assembly steps are now integrated into one continuous 3D printing process, dramatically reducing manufacturing lead time while achieving complex geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The additive manufacturing process performs preliminary action by creating the final complex geometry directly during manufacturing, eliminating the need for subsequent machining and assembly operations. The fitting is printed in its near-final state with integrated features, reducing lead time by removing post-processing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If standard 90° deflection angles are used in traditional fittings, then the fittings meet conventional design requirements, but the deflection angle is suboptimal for fuel flow efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel flow efficiencyVSAvoiddeflection angle
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the deflection angle from the conventional 90° to a non-standard angle (such as 135° or other optimized values) that minimizes flow separation and turbulence. This parameter optimization improves fuel flow efficiency by reducing pressure losses while the additive manufacturing process enables achieving this precise optimized angle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If traditional manufacturing methods are used, then drain tubes can be installed, but single-point failure risks exist and complex drilling passages are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure resistanceVSAvoiddrilling passages complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the drain tube system into multiple independent drain tubes instead of relying on a single drain passage. This segmentation ensures that if one drain tube becomes blocked or fails, other drain tubes remain functional, providing redundancy and improving reliability. The additive manufacturing process enables easily integrating multiple drain tubes without the complexity of drilling and aligning multiple passages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces part weight by 30%, enhances fuel flow efficiency, eliminates 90° deflection angles, and prevents single-point failures in drain features, while enabling complex geometries that were previously unachievable with traditional machining.

Implementation Method 1

loading a build file into a Selective Laser Melting (SLM) additive manufacturing machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective Laser Melting: Laser Beam Welding

Data Source

PatentUS11549629B2Enhanced fluid deflection angle structures and methods for manufacturing
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 THE BOEING CO
  • US11549629B2 patent drawing
  • US11549629B2 patent drawing
  • US11549629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A 3D-printed aluminum fuel fitting solution demonstrates higher performance at a potentially lower cost and shorter lead time. The resulting geometry also produced 30% weight savings leaving all interfaces intact.