3D-Printed Intervertebral Disk with Morphology-Matched Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current artificial disk replacement and fusion devices face challenges such as potential damage to nearby tissues during milling and shaping, poor connection between implant and bone due to surface morphology mismatch, and loosening of the prosthesis, leading to subsidence and non-uniform ingrowth of bony material, affecting long-term stability.

Innovation Solution

The use of 3D-printed implant devices that match the surface morphology of the vertebrae endplates and artificial disk, fabricated through three-dimensional additive manufacturing, eliminating the need for milling and shaping, and ensuring a precise fit and improved bone integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional metal implants are used with milling and shaping procedures, then the implant can be securely fixed in place, but nearby disks, nerves, blood vessels, joints and vertebral bodies may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant fixation securityVSAvoiddamage to nearby tissues
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is pre-shaped to match the patient's specific anatomy through 3D printing before surgery, eliminating the need for intraoperative milling and shaping that could damage surrounding tissues. The custom-fit design is prepared in advance based on preoperative imaging data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional metal implants with standard surface morphology are used, then the implant can be manufactured reliably, but the connection between implant and bone may be poor due to surface morphology mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant manufacturing reliabilityVSAvoidimplant-bone connection quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant surface is customized to match the specific anatomical features of the patient's bone structure, creating optimal local contact areas for bone integration. The 3D printing process enables region-specific surface morphology that varies across different parts of the implant to match the corresponding bone surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If traditional implants are used, then the procedure can be performed with standard devices, but loosening of the prosthesis may occur leading to subsidence and non-uniform ingrowth of bony material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure simplicityVSAvoidlong-term implant stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is created as a precise digital copy of the patient's specific anatomical space, reproduced through 3D printing technology. This custom copy ensures perfect geometric matching with the patient's unique bone structure, preventing loosening and promoting uniform bone ingrowth patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12102544B2Bio-mechanically compatible 3D-printed intervertebral disk
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 NIVALON MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12102544B2 patent drawing
  • US12102544B2 patent drawing
  • US12102544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An artificial replacement disk configured to be positioned in between a superior vertebrae and an inferior vertebrae. The upper and lower surfaces match the surface morphologies of the corresponding vertebrae and may be textured to promote bone in-growth. The artificial replacement disk may comprise gripping structures to permit easy manipulation of the artificial replacement disk during surgical procedures.