3D Printed Marks for Automated Material Treatment Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for additive manufacturing do not effectively automate or simplify the subsequent treatment of workpieces by utilizing marks created during the process for controlling material application or ablation, limiting the precision and efficiency of further processing operations.

Innovation Solution

The method employs marks such as depressions and protrusions on workpieces to control material ablation or application processes, using visual, optical, or tactile sensors to assess their disappearance, allowing for automated control of grinding, varnishing, or printing operations, and incorporating additional encoded information for layer thickness and type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If marks are used only for identification purposes in additive manufacturing, then workpiece identification is achieved, but subsequent treatment processes remain manual and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of subsequent treatmentVSAvoidautomation of material application or ablation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The mark structure is designed to serve multiple functions: it acts as both an identification code for workpiece recognition and as a control pattern for automated material application or ablation processes. The same depressions or protrusions that encode identification information also guide the subsequent treatment, eliminating the need for separate identification and control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mark structure serves as an intermediary between the workpiece and the treatment process. Sensors detect the mark features (depressions or protrusions), and this information mediates the control of material application or ablation, enabling automated decision-making about where and how much material to apply or remove.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple layers of material are applied manually to achieve desired thickness, then coating coverage is achieved, but process time and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of material layer thicknessVSAvoidtime for material application
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mark structure with varying depression or protrusion heights is created during the additive manufacturing process itself, before the subsequent treatment. This preliminary encoding of thickness information allows the system to pre-plan the exact material application requirements, eliminating the need for multiple manual trial-and-error coating passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors (optical or tactile) detect the mark features on the workpiece, providing feedback information about the required material thickness and distribution. This feedback enables the treatment system to automatically adjust material application parameters in real-time, achieving precise thickness control without manual intervention or multiple passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform material ablation is applied across the entire workpiece surface, then surface smoothing is achieved, but excessive material is removed from areas requiring less treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of treatment processVSAvoidmaterial removal amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The mark structure encodes location-specific information about the required ablation depth and extent. Different areas of the workpiece have different depression or protrusion patterns that indicate their specific treatment requirements. This allows the ablation process to be customized for each local area, removing only the necessary amount of material from each region rather than applying uniform treatment across the entire surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11453167B2Method for providing codes on components during a 3D manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG
  • US11453167B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for controlling the subsequent treatment of a workpiece that has previously been manufactured in an additive manufacturing process and has had marks formed thereon during the additive manufacturing process. The marks are used to control the application or ablation of material in the subsequent treatment of the workpiece.