3D Printed Papermaking Belts for Structural Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing methods for papermaking fabrics lack versatility and are limited in their ability to produce fabrics with precise structural and topographical profiles, which are critical for controlling tissue web quality attributes such as softness and strength.

Innovation Solution

The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to lay down polymers with specific material properties in an additive manner under computer control, creating endless belts with unique structural and topographical profiles, including stability against heat and moisture, by printing polymeric material on a substrate such as a woven polymer structure and laminating it using methods like adhesive, solvent bonding, or ultrasonic lamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional weaving and heat setting methods are used to manufacture forming fabrics, then the manufacturing process is simple and well-established, but the ability to produce fabrics with precise structural and topographical profiles is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural and topographical profile precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical weaving and heat setting processes with 3D printing technology. The 3D printing system uses computer-controlled deposition of polymeric material to directly create the desired fabric structure and topography, eliminating the need for complex weaving looms and multiple heat setting stages while achieving superior precision in structural profiles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental manufacturing parameters from traditional weaving (thread interlacing, tension, temperature) to 3D printing parameters (material deposition rate, layer thickness, print head temperature, indexing position). This parameter transformation enables precise control over fabric structure and topography that was previously unattainable with conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional weaving methods are used, then the manufacturing process is easier to implement, but versatility in producing different fabric configurations is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric configuration versatilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D printing system serves multiple functions: it can produce different fabric patterns, topographies, and structures by simply changing the digital design file, eliminating the need for different weaving looms or tooling for each fabric type. The same printing apparatus can manufacture forming fabrics, press fabrics, and dryer fabrics with varying configurations through software control alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process becomes dynamic and adaptable through computer-controlled parameters. The print head can vary deposition patterns, material flow rates, and layer configurations in real-time based on the digital model, allowing rapid transition between different fabric designs without retooling or reconfiguring physical equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional manufacturing methods are used, then production is simpler, but control over web structure and topography is insufficient for precise quality attribute control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweb structure and topography controlVSAvoidprinting and lamination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D printing process enables local quality control by allowing different regions of the fabric to have precisely tailored properties. The computer-controlled system can vary material deposition, layer density, and topographical features at specific locations to optimize local performance characteristics such as drainage rates, fiber support, and web formation in different zones of the fabric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of papermaking belts with enhanced stability and control over web structure and topography, improving the quality attributes of tissue products by allowing for complex geometries and precise control of fabric properties that traditional methods cannot achieve.

Implementation Method 1

printing polymeric material on a print medium along a print direction in a series of printing steps

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

laminating it using methods like adhesive, solvent bonding, or ultrasonic lamination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

laminating it using methods like adhesive, solvent bonding, or ultrasonic lamination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic lamination: Ultrasonic Vibration

Data Source

PatentEP3793821B1Manufacturing process for papermaking endless belts using 3D printing technology
Publication Date: 2024.07.10 STRUCTURED I LLC
  • EP3793821B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3793821B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3793821B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus for producing endless 3-D printed belts using in papermaking and an apparatus for producing endless 3-D printed belts laminated to a substrate for additional strength and dimensional stability during use.