3D Printed Swabs with Breakable Joint for Pandemic Mass Production

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a shortage of nasal and oral swabs during pandemics, such as the COVID-19 crisis, due to the high demand for testing kits, which traditional manufacturing methods struggle to meet, necessitating rapid and mass production of swabs for effective disease testing.

Innovation Solution

The development of 3D printed nasal and oral swabs with a rigid structure and bendable properties, utilizing a combination of soft and brittle photosensitive materials, allowing for mass production and efficient sample collection, with a breakpoint for easy laboratory testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manufacturing methods are used to produce swabs, then manufacturing precision and reliability are maintained, but productivity is insufficient to meet pandemic testing demands

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing process from traditional molding to 3D printing, fundamentally altering production parameters to enable rapid prototyping and mass production. This allows customization of swab geometry while maintaining manufacturing precision, and significantly increases productivity by enabling parallel production of multiple swab variants simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D printing process serves multiple functions: it can produce different swab designs, modify existing designs, create custom geometries, and rapidly iterate prototypes. This multi-functionality replaces multiple specialized manufacturing processes, simplifying the overall manufacturing system while increasing flexibility and output capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If 3D printing is used to mass produce swabs, then productivity increases, but manufacturing precision and material consistency become challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary digital modeling and simulation before actual production. CAD designs are optimized for 3D printing parameters, and print settings are pre-calibrated to ensure dimensional accuracy. This preliminary preparation ensures that mass-produced swabs maintain consistent geometry and quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes 3D printing parameters such as layer height, infill density, and print speed to achieve the desired balance between productivity and precision. By carefully controlling these parameters, the system maintains manufacturing precision while enabling rapid production of large volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If single-material 3D printing is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to create bendable and rigid regions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multi-material 3D printing to create swabs with different mechanical properties in different regions. The handle is printed with rigid material for structural support, while the shaft and tip use flexible materials for comfort and navigation. This composite approach enables precise control over flexibility and rigidity throughout the swab structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the swab based on local functional requirements. The breakable region uses material with controlled fracture properties, the collection tip uses soft flexible material, and the handle uses rigid material. This local differentiation optimizes performance while managing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If swabs are designed for easy breakage at the breakpoint, then ease of operation for sample disposal is improved, but structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the swab into distinct segments with different strength characteristics. The breakpoint is designed as a deliberate weak point that separates the disposable tip section from the reusable handle. This segmentation allows the swab to maintain sufficient strength for sample collection while enabling easy breakage for disposal, as the break point is strategically located where structural load is minimal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and large-scale production of swabs with the right balance of flexibility and rigidity, facilitating effective sample collection and easy disposal, addressing the shortage and improving testing capacity during outbreaks.

Implementation Method 1

a first photosensitive material that is generally soft and bendable when cured, and a second photosensitive material that is generally rigid and brittle when cured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS11890173B23D printed nasal pharyngeal and oral swabs
Publication Date: 2024.02.06
  • US11890173B2 patent drawing
  • US11890173B2 patent drawing
  • US11890173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is generally a nasal pharyngeal and oral swab that may be mass-produced via three-dimensional (3D) printing. To achieve the right materials for 3D printing the swabs, exemplary embodiments employ a set of materials that result in a rigid structure that has bendable properties (at least in the neck or stem region of the swab), but more rigid and bridle properties at a breakpoint of the swab. In exemplary embodiments, this may be achieved by constructing the device of a first photosensitive material that is generally soft and bendable when cured, and a second photosensitive material that is generally rigid and brittle when cured, wherein the soft bendable material comprises of about 70% to 90% of the photosensitive composition used to 3D print the swab, and the rigid and brittle material comprises of about 30% to 10% of the photosensitive composition used to 3D print the swab.