3D Printer Capability Queries for Compatible Machine-Ready Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current three-dimensional printing systems face challenges in selecting suitable machine-ready models that match the specific configuration of individual printers, leading to inefficiencies in fabrication due to a lack of knowledge about the printers' properties by service providers.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves querying and utilizing a dictionary of printer capabilities to select suitable models or generate new ones based on hardware, software, and firmware properties, ensuring compatibility and optimal fabrication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If machine-ready models are selected without querying printer configuration, then model selection is faster and simpler, but compatibility and fabrication accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication accuracyVSAvoidmodel selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by querying and storing printer configuration information (hardware, software, firmware) in advance. This pre-acquired configuration data is then used to automatically match and select compatible machine-ready models, eliminating the need for manual configuration checking and ensuring fabrication accuracy without adding operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by comparing printer configuration properties with model requirements. The configuration information serves as feedback to determine whether a selected model is compatible with the specific printer, allowing automatic adjustment or rejection of incompatible models to ensure manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If printer configuration information is queried and stored, then model compatibility improves, but system complexity and data management burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel compatibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies universality by creating a standardized configuration information structure that serves multiple functions: hardware identification, software version tracking, firmware verification, and model compatibility assessment. This multi-functional configuration framework improves reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating and storing digital representations (dictionaries) of printer configuration information. These configuration copies are then used for model matching and compatibility verification, allowing the system to reference printer properties without directly accessing the physical printer during model selection, thereby managing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If configuration queries are implemented, then model selection accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs configuration queries as preliminary actions during system initialization or printer connection. By acquiring configuration information in advance rather than during each model selection event, the system minimizes processing time impact while maintaining high model selection accuracy through available configuration data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by querying only the specific configuration parameters necessary for model compatibility assessment, rather than gathering all possible printer information. This selective querying approach maintains model selection accuracy while reducing unnecessary processing time and data management overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11886774B2Detection and use of printer configuration information
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 STRATASYS INC
  • US11886774B2 patent drawing
  • US11886774B2 patent drawing
  • US11886774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The hardware and software properties of a three-dimensional printer can be queried and applied to select suitable directly printable models for the printer, or to identify situations where a new machine-ready model must be generated. The properties may be any properties relevant to fabrication including, e.g., physical properties of the printer, printer firmware, user settings, hardware configurations, and so forth. A printer may respond to configuration queries with a dictionary of capabilities or properties, and this dictionary may be used to select suitable models, or determine when a new model must be created. Similarly, when a printable model is sent to the printer, metadata for the printable model may be compared to printer properties in the dictionary to ensure that the model can be fabricated by the printer.