3D Printing Beam Assignment Using Huffman Workload Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing methods face inefficiencies in workload distribution and increased manufacturing time due to manual assignment of energy beams for objects with varying shapes and dimensions, leading to uneven irradiation times and laborious process management.

Innovation Solution

The method employs Huffman coding to automatically assign parts of layers to energy beams based on estimated irradiation times, ensuring an equal distribution of workload by generating a Huffman tree that groups parts with similar irradiation times, allowing for optimized energy beam utilization across multiple objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual assignment of energy beams to objects is used, then the process is simple to implement, but the workload distribution becomes uneven and manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of beam assignmentVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic workload distribution through a control unit that calculates and assigns energy beam paths without manual intervention. The control unit evaluates object parameters, determines optimal beam assignments, and balances the workload across multiple energy beams automatically, eliminating the need for manual assignment while optimizing manufacturing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by transitioning from manual to automated beam assignment. The control unit uses algorithms to dynamically adjust beam path assignments based on object characteristics, layer thickness, and material properties, thereby optimizing the distribution of workload and reducing overall manufacturing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If entire objects are assigned to single energy beams, then the assignment process is straightforward, but the workload distribution becomes uneven when objects differ in shape and dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of object assignmentVSAvoiddowntime of energy beams
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the workload by dividing the build plate into multiple regions and assigning different energy beams to different regions. Objects are distributed across these regions, allowing multiple energy beams to work simultaneously on different parts of the build plate, thereby balancing the workload and reducing downtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic workload distribution where the control unit continuously monitors and adjusts beam assignments based on real-time progress. The assignment is not static but adapts to the varying complexity and size of objects, ensuring that no single energy beam becomes a bottleneck while maximizing utilization of all available beams

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If manual workload estimation is used, then the process requires minimal computational resources, but the overall minimum manufacturing time cannot be found accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing time optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors the manufacturing progress and adjusts beam assignments accordingly. By evaluating the actual progress and comparing it with the planned schedule, the system can dynamically reassign workloads to minimize total manufacturing time while managing computational resources efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces overall manufacturing time by ensuring equal distribution of irradiation times across energy beams, minimizing downtime and optimizing the manufacturing process, even when dealing with complex or multiple objects.

Implementation Method 1

selective irradiation and consolidation of layers of a build material which can be consolidated by means of an energy beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective laser melting: Laser

Implementation Method 2

irradiating layers of the object in a build plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11364686B2Method for operating an apparatus for additively manufacturing of three-dimensional objects
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 CONCEPT LASER
  • US11364686B2 patent drawing
  • US11364686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for operating at least one apparatus for additively manufacturing of three-dimensional objects by means of successive layerwise selective irradiation and consolidation of layers of a build material which can be consolidated by means of an energy beam, wherein at least one object is being built by successively irradiating layers of the object in a build plane, wherein at least one part of at least one layer of the object is assigned to be irradiated by a first energy beam and at least one other part of at least one layer of the object is assigned to be irradiated by another energy beam, wherein the parts of layers are assigned to be irradiated by one of the at least two energy beams based on a Huffman coding.