3D Printing Device Bulk Material Volume Tapering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing methods face challenges in efficiently manufacturing large and geometrically complex products while minimizing material usage and manufacturing time, often resulting in excessive bulk material usage and increased costs due to the need for large build spaces and inefficient recycling of unused material.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for additive manufacturing that evaluates the angle of repose of the material used, applying layers parallel to a support with an angle equal to or lower than the material's angle of repose, forming a tapering bulk material volume with a smaller top portion, reducing the amount of material needed and minimizing wear, and allowing for flexible handling and operation within confined spaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If layers are applied at an angle greater than the angle of repose to enable continuous manufacturing, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but collisions between the print head and accumulated particulate material occur causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoiddevice reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the critical parameter from layer application angle to angle of repose ratio. By maintaining the layer application angle within the angle of repose limit, the system prevents particulate material collapse and print head collisions, ensuring reliable operation while achieving continuous manufacturing through optimized layer deposition patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Volume of moving object

If a large build space is used to accommodate abundant bulk material, then large and geometrically complex products can be manufactured, but manufacturing time and material recycling time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild volumeVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and optimizing the bulk material volume configuration before manufacturing begins. By using angle of repose-based calculations to determine the minimum necessary bulk material volume, the system prepares an optimized build configuration that reduces both material quantity and manufacturing time while ensuring product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using only the necessary amount of bulk material required for the specific product geometry, rather than filling the entire build space. This optimized approach uses precisely the right amount of material needed for support and manufacturing, reducing waste and recycling time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If abundant bulk material is used in confined build spaces, then manufacturing flexibility is maintained, but material waste increases and recycling efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using angle of repose measurements to dynamically optimize bulk material volume calculations. The system continuously monitors material properties and adjusts the bulk material configuration accordingly, ensuring optimal material usage that maintains manufacturing flexibility while minimizing waste and improving recycling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces material requirements, energy consumption, and manufacturing time, while enhancing recycling efficiency and reducing material waste, making the process more cost-effective and efficient for both small and large-scale 3D printing applications.

Implementation Method 1

The material used in the material layers is evaluated to establish the angle of repose of the material. The at least one layer applying unit applies the material layers parallel to the support, the plurality of material layers being deposited such that at least one side of the bulk material volume has an angle with respect to the support that is equal to, or lower, than the angle of repose for the material used

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAngle of repose: Angle of Repose

Data Source

PatentEP3565707B1A method for printing a 3D product and a 3D printing device
Publication Date: 2023.03.01 L3F SWEDEN
  • EP3565707B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3565707B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3565707B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method for manufacturing of one or more 3D products by additive manufacturing using a layer-by-layer technique using a3D printing device (1). The 3D printing device (1) comprises at least one layer applying unit (3) for depositing a plurality of material layers, a support (4) arranged to receive the material layers, and a layer bonding unit (5) for binding selected portions of the material layers together such that the one or more 3D products are formed. The at least one layer applying unit (3) applying the material layers parallel to the support (4). The method comprising the steps of depositing the material layers forming a bulk material volume (51, 51', 51''). The material layers are applied such that the bulk material volume (51, 51', 51'') comprises a base portion (52) and a top portion (53), whereby the bulk material volume (51, 51', 51'') is formed such that the top portion (53) is smaller than the base portion (52). A 3D printing device is further disclosed.