3D Printing Design System for Novice Users

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 3D printing systems and design software have limitations, such as only supporting the design and fabrication of solid models, and requiring additional frames or platforms that are beyond the expertise of non-expert users, and often result in models that require support material or rafts for printing, which are not desired.

Innovation Solution

A system that enables novice users to design and print 3D models using desktop 3D printers by providing pre-designed parts with snap-together connections, a user-friendly interface for modifying and assembling parts, and optimizing designs for printability without support material or rafts, utilizing Constructive Solid Geometry techniques and programmatically defined components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional 3D printing systems are used to design and fabricate solid models, then fabrication capability is provided, but the system complexity increases and requires additional frames or platforms that are beyond the expertise of non-expert users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of design and fabricationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex 3D printing process into simplified components: pre-designed parts with standardized connectors, automated assembly guidance, and modular configuration options. This allows users to create complex models without understanding the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service capabilities through automated model generation, automatic optimization for printability, and intelligent part assembly recommendations. The system handles complex tasks autonomously while providing user-friendly interfaces for non-expert users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If additional frames or platforms are used to accommodate printing of certain models, then printability is improved, but the quantity of material increases and cleanup work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprintabilityVSAvoidmaterial quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization of model designs for printability before fabrication, automatically adjusting geometries and orientations to eliminate the need for support material or rafts. This prevents the need for additional material while ensuring successful printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If support material or rafts are used to hold prints in place, then print stability is improved, but the quantity of material increases and post-processing work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint stabilityVSAvoidsupport material quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization of model designs for printability, automatically adjusting geometries and orientations to eliminate the need for support material or rafts. This prevents the need for additional material while ensuring successful printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If pre-designed parts with snap-together connections are provided, then ease of assembly is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidpart design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal connector designs that can be used across multiple parts and model configurations. These standardized interfaces simplify assembly while the underlying parametric design system handles the complexity of generating optimized part geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10078325B2Systems and methods for designing programmable parts for models and optimizing 3D printing
Publication Date: 2018.09.18 AUTODESK INC
  • US10078325B2 patent drawing
  • US10078325B2 patent drawing
  • US10078325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques include, in at least one aspect, a method including receiving user selection of parts from a plurality of virtual parts to build a virtual 3D model in a modeling environment, receiving user instruction for modifying or assembling of at least one of the selected parts within the modeling environment, validating the user instruction against physical constraints of an associated 3D printer; and outputting the virtual 3D model for 3D printing on the associated 3D printer after the validating.