3D Printing Time and Material Estimation with Low-Resolution Slicing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D inkjet printing processes are time-consuming and require significant material usage, necessitating a rapid and accurate method to determine the time duration and material required for printing 3D objects.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for calculating printing time and material consumption using a 3D digital dataset with a slicing resolution lower than the printing resolution, involving modules to generate, associate data elements with materials, and calculate based on printing parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a high printing resolution is used for calculating material consumption and printing time, then the accuracy of the calculation is improved, but the computational burden and time required for calculation increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the calculation process into two distinct stages: a pre-calculation phase using low-resolution slicing to estimate total material consumption and printing time, and a detailed phase using high-resolution slicing only for specific regions or final verification. This segmentation allows the system to obtain reasonably accurate estimates quickly without the prohibitive computational cost of processing entire models at full printing resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing high-resolution calculations only on portions of the model that require precise material estimation, while using low-resolution calculations for the majority of the model. This approach provides sufficient accuracy for planning purposes while dramatically reducing overall computational requirements compared to processing the entire model at full resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If the slicing resolution is reduced to decrease computational burden, then the calculation speed is improved, but the accuracy of material consumption and printing time estimation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidestimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model into different regions with varying complexity and applies different slicing resolutions to each segment. High-resolution slicing is applied only to regions with complex geometries or critical material consumption areas, while low-resolution slicing is used for simpler regions. This selective approach maintains estimation accuracy for critical areas while improving overall calculation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different calculation precisions to different parts of the model based on their specific requirements. Regions with overhangs, support structures, or complex features receive higher resolution analysis, while straightforward geometric regions use lower resolution. This ensures that estimation accuracy is optimized where it matters most while maintaining high overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed high-resolution slicing is performed for the entire model, then the precision of material and time estimation is improved, but the computational resources and processing time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimation precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational task into hierarchical levels: first performing a global low-resolution analysis to establish baseline material consumption and time estimates, then performing localized high-resolution analysis only on regions that significantly impact the overall estimates. This hierarchical segmentation reduces computational complexity from processing every voxel at full resolution to processing only critical regions at high resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies excessive action selectively by performing more detailed calculations than strictly necessary for the entire model, but only in regions where such detail provides meaningful improvement to estimation accuracy. This partial application of high-resolution analysis achieves near-full-resolution precision for critical areas while avoiding the prohibitive computational cost of processing the entire model at maximum detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12554904B2Systems and methods for calculating a time duration and an amount of material required for printing a three-dimensional object
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 STRATASYS LTD
  • US12554904B2 patent drawing
  • US12554904B2 patent drawing
  • US12554904B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for calculating a printing time duration and an amount of material consumption required for one or more materials required for printing a tray arrangement including one or more 3D objects using a 3D printing system, including: receiving a 3D model of a tray arrangement including one or more 3D objects to be printed using a 3D printing system; and generating, based on the 3D model, a 3D digital dataset comprising a plurality of data elements arranged in a set of horizontal slices, wherein a slicing resolution of the 3D digital dataset is lower than a printing resolution of the 3D printing system.