3D Printing Feedback Control for Real-Time Process Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D printing systems are inefficient, leading to substantial material waste and longer processing times due to the lack of automated control mechanisms that optimize material usage and energy consumption, resulting in reduced accuracy and increased operational complexity.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a control system that utilizes sensors and energy sources embedded in the platform to monitor and adjust formation parameters in real-time, optimizing the 3D printing process by adjusting energy beam characteristics and material deposition, thereby minimizing material loss and processing time while ensuring high accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If automated control mechanisms are implemented to optimize material usage and energy consumption, then manufacturing precision and productivity improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback control by monitoring formation parameters during the 3D printing process and automatically adjusting process variables to maintain optimal conditions. Sensors detect deviations from target parameters and the control system responds by modifying energy beam characteristics or material deposition rates, thereby improving manufacturing precision without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-optimization by automatically adjusting process parameters based on real-time sensor data. The system monitors its own performance and makes corrections to formation parameters without external intervention, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high manufacturing precision through autonomous adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If real-time monitoring and adjustment of formation parameters is implemented, then productivity and manufacturing precision improve, but use of energy and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic control by continuously adjusting energy beam parameters and material deposition rates based on real-time process conditions. The system adapts formation parameters dynamically during printing, optimizing processing speed and productivity while managing energy consumption through intelligent parameter modulation rather than constant high-energy operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system optimizes productivity by dynamically changing process parameters such as energy beam power, scanning speed, and layer thickness based on real-time feedback. These parameter adjustments allow the system to maintain high processing speeds while reducing overall energy consumption by operating at optimal rather than maximum levels throughout the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If sensors and energy sources are embedded in the platform for real-time control, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity and initial material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges sensors and energy sources directly into the platform structure, integrating monitoring and control functions into the base component. This consolidation improves manufacturing precision by enabling direct measurement and control at the source while reducing overall system complexity through functional integration rather than separate distributed components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Loss of substance

If automated control systems optimize material deposition, then loss of substance decreases and productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system monitors material deposition in real-time and automatically adjusts deposition parameters to optimize material usage. By detecting variations in layer formation and responding with corrective adjustments, the system minimizes material waste while maintaining simple automated control architecture through straightforward feedback loops rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables the efficient formation of 3D objects with reduced material waste and shorter processing times, achieving high accuracy by providing real-time feedback and adaptive control over the printing process.

Implementation Method 1

an energy source that provides a directional energy beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy beam transformation: Laser

Implementation Method 2

a first sensor that senses one or more input signals and generates a first output signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240051231A1Control systems for three-dimensional printing
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 VELO3D INC
  • US20240051231A1 patent drawing
  • US20240051231A1 patent drawing
  • US20240051231A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are systems, apparatuses and methods for monitoring a three-dimensional printing process. The three-dimensional printing process can be monitored in-situ and/or in real time. Monitoring of the three-dimensional printing process can be non-invasive. A computer control system can be coupled to one or more detectors and signal processing units to adjust the generation of a three-dimensional object that is formed by the three-dimensional printing.