3D Printing Upstroke Force Control for Collision Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques, particularly bottom-up stereolithography, lack efficient methods for industrial use, require manual tuning of velocity and acceleration, and are prone to damage from foreign objects and overloading, especially when producing objects with unvented cavities or flexible materials.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method using force sensors and controllers to regulate the speed and acceleration of the upstroke in additive manufacturing, incorporating collision detection with multiple force sensors to prevent damage and automate the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tuning of velocity and acceleration is used in additive manufacturing, then the process can be controlled, but the ease of operation deteriorates and time is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoidmanual tuning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements force feedback control where force sensors continuously monitor the force applied during the upstroke, and the controller automatically adjusts velocity and acceleration based on the sensed force to maintain it near a target value. This eliminates manual tuning while preserving process control through automated closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If high speed and acceleration are used in additive manufacturing, then productivity is improved, but the risk of damage from foreign objects and overloading increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoiddamage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs force monitoring and feedback control that detects abnormal forces indicating foreign objects or overloading conditions before they cause damage. The system automatically reduces speed and acceleration when force thresholds are exceeded, providing protective action in advance to prevent mechanical component damage while maintaining high productivity during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If force feedback control is implemented, then ease of operation is improved and manual tuning is eliminated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual mechanical tuning mechanisms with an automated electronic control system that uses force sensors and feedback algorithms. This substitution eliminates the need for operator intervention and manual adjustments, improving ease of operation despite the added electronic control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If force sensors and feedback control are added, then reliability is improved by preventing damage, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidsensor and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements force feedback control where force sensors continuously monitor the force applied during the upstroke, and the controller automatically adjusts velocity and acceleration based on the sensed force to maintain it near a target value. This eliminates manual tuning while preserving process control through automated closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces the need for manual tuning, minimizes damage to mechanical components, and effectively detects and prevents collisions with foreign objects, enabling the production of high-quality three-dimensional objects with complex geometries.

Implementation Method 1

a light source configured to irradiate the build region through the window to form a solid polymer from the polymerizable liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20250387976A1Force-regulated additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 CARBON INC
  • US20250387976A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387976A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387976A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a three-dimensional object includes: (a) providing an apparatus (b) vertically reciprocating a carrier with respect to a build surface in an upstroke and a downstroke to form a build region between a growing object and the build surface, and to fill the build region with the polymerizable liquid, while also: (i) sensing force exerted between the carrier and the build surface through the growing object and the polymerizable liquid during the upstroke; and (ii) modifying the speed and/or acceleration of the upstroke in response to the sensed force so that the sensed force approaches a predetermined target force; then (c) irradiating the build region with light to form a new portion of the object from the polymerizable liquid on the growing object; and then (d) repeating steps (b) through (c) to form additional portions on the growing object until the three-dimensional object is formed.