3D Printing Irradiation Control for Detail-Speed Tradeoffs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing methods face challenges in efficiently irradiating three-dimensional objects with both high resolution and writing speed, particularly when dealing with intricate details and larger structures, as they require compromising between lower energy sources for fine structures and higher energy sources for larger areas, leading to increased writing time.

Innovation Solution

A method that assigns specific irradiation parameters based on geometry information to different regions of a three-dimensional object, allowing for the use of appropriate energy beam intensity and spot size for each region, thereby optimizing the irradiation process for both fine details and larger areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If lower energy sources with smaller spot sizes are used to irradiate filigree parts, then manufacturing precision is improved, but writing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution of geometrical detailsVSAvoidwriting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different irradiation parameters to different regions of the build plane based on local geometry characteristics. Regions with filigree parts receive parameters optimized for high resolution (lower energy, smaller spot size), while regions with massive structures receive parameters optimized for speed (higher energy, larger spot size). This resolves the contradiction by making the irradiation process adaptive to local requirements rather than using uniform parameters throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by dynamically adjusting irradiation parameters during the manufacturing process. The control unit automatically modifies energy source intensity and spot size based on real-time analysis of the geometry data for different regions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to switch between high-resolution mode for delicate features and high-speed mode for robust structures, eliminating the need to compromise overall writing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If higher energy sources with larger spot sizes are used to irradiate larger areas, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewriting speedVSAvoidresolution of geometrical details
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different irradiation parameters to different regions of the build plane based on local geometry characteristics. Regions with filigree parts receive parameters optimized for high resolution (lower energy, smaller spot size), while regions with massive structures receive parameters optimized for speed (higher energy, larger spot size). This resolves the contradiction by making the irradiation process adaptive to local requirements rather than using uniform parameters throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the build plane into multiple regions based on geometry analysis. Each region is independently evaluated and assigned appropriate irradiation parameters. This segmentation allows the system to process different areas with optimized parameters simultaneously, maintaining high productivity while ensuring precision in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If uniform irradiation parameters are used for all regions, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates for filigree parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveirradiation parameter configurationVSAvoidresolution of geometrical details
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing geometry analysis and parameter assignment before the actual irradiation process begins. The control unit pre-processes the geometry data to identify regions with filigree parts and assigns appropriate irradiation parameters to each region in advance. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for complex real-time adjustments during irradiation, maintaining manageable device complexity while achieving high precision through proactive parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient irradiation of filigree parts and reduces writing time by allowing for the use of smaller spot sizes and lower intensities where necessary, while using larger spot sizes and higher intensities where appropriate, thereby improving the overall manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an energy source, in particular a laser beam or an electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam irradiation: Laser

Implementation Method 2

a selective laser sintering apparatus, a selective laser melting apparatus or a selective electron beam melting apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective laser sintering: Selective Laser Sintering

Implementation Method 3

successive selective layerwise consolidation of layers of a build material which can be consolidated by means of an energy source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy beam consolidation:

Data Source

PatentUS11440262B2Method for operating an apparatus for additively manufacturing three-dimensional objects
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 CONCEPT LASER
  • US11440262B2 patent drawing
  • US11440262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for operating an apparatus (1) for additively manufacturing three-dimensional objects (2) by means of successive layerwise selective irradiation and consolidation of layers of a build material (3) which can be consolidated by means of an energy source, wherein irradiation data define at least two regions (8, 9) of object data relating to a three-dimensional object (2), which regions (8, 9) are irradiated based on at least two different irradiation parameters.