3D Printing Parameter Encryption Using RFID Material Tags

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D printing systems fail to effectively preserve the confidentiality and proprietary nature of printing parameters, as they are susceptible to reverse engineering, particularly when software and parameters are shared with materials, compromising the efforts and resources invested in developing these parameters.

Innovation Solution

The method involves recording encrypted printing parameters onto a digital tag applied to a cartridge, which is then decrypted within the 3D printer or an external server, allowing the generation of machine code for printing specific materials while maintaining confidentiality, using various encryption standards like DES, TripleDES, RSA, or AES.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If printing parameters are supplied with material and software is configured to generate machine code, then printing functionality is enabled, but parameters become susceptible to reverse engineering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting functionalityVSAvoidparameter confidentiality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the printing parameters from the software and material packaging, storing them separately in encrypted form on a RFID tag attached to the material reel. The software no longer contains the parameters directly,而是 references them through the RFID tag, thereby protecting the parameters from reverse engineering while maintaining printing functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a RFID tag as an intermediary between the material and the printing parameters. The RFID tag stores encrypted parameters and requires authentication through the spatial printer driver/controller, creating a secure mediation layer that prevents direct access and reverse engineering while enabling authorized printing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If microchip with operational parameters is distributed with material, then basic printing information is provided, but detailed printing profile cannot be obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasic printing informationVSAvoidprinting profile completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the parameter information into two levels: basic operational parameters stored on the RFID tag for immediate access, and detailed printing parameters stored encrypted within the spatial printer driver/controller. This segmentation allows basic printing to proceed while protecting the complete printing profile from exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the detailed printing parameters from the physical material package into a digital dimension within the spatial printer driver/controller software. This dimensional transition allows the parameters to be accessed only through authenticated printing operations, preventing extraction and reverse engineering while maintaining full functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If RFID tag with decrypted parameters is used, then communication with printer is enabled, but parameters are exposed and can be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinter communicationVSAvoidparameter security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the state of the parameters from decrypted to encrypted form on the RFID tag. The encrypted parameters can still be communicated with the printer through authentication protocols, but their confidential nature is preserved. The encryption parameters (keys, algorithms) are managed within the spatial printer driver/controller, maintaining security while enabling communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11097489B2Methods of controlling 3D printing processes
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 3DGENCE AMERICA INC
  • US11097489B2 patent drawing
  • US11097489B2 patent drawing
  • US11097489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for controlling a three-dimensional (3D) printing process are disclosed. In such methods, for example, encrypted printing parameters for a specific printing material are recorded onto a digital tag. The digital tag is then applied to a cartridge that holds the printing material, which is subsequently inserted into a 3D printer. The printer is then instructed to decrypt the encrypted printing parameters to produce a set of decrypted printing parameters. A set of spatial model specifications are also provided to the 3D printer. The 3D printer is then instructed to generate printing machine code based on the decrypted printing parameters and spatial model specifications. Finally, the 3D printer is instructed to manufacture a physical model based on the printing machine code.