3D Model Rendering Using Reference Image Viewpoint Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generating high-quality 2D images of virtual 3D models is challenging due to the difficulty in determining appropriate imaging parameters that mimic real-life images, especially in e-commerce platforms, which can be costly and time-consuming for merchants to achieve through traditional photo shoots.

Innovation Solution

A system determines virtual imaging parameters based on 2D images of other objects to generate consistent 2D images of virtual 3D models, incorporating aspects like viewpoint, orientation, lighting, and background setup, using techniques such as reverse engineering and machine learning to replicate desirable image qualities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional photo shoots are used to generate 2D images of virtual 3D models, then image quality can be maintained, but cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of physical objects as 3D models, then generates 2D images from these digital replicas. This copying approach eliminates the need for repeated physical photo shoots while maintaining image quality, as the virtual 3D model can be rendered infinitely without additional time or resource investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical photography process (cameras, lighting equipment, physical setups) with computational rendering methods. By substituting physical imaging mechanisms with software-based 3D rendering, the system achieves comparable image quality without the time-consuming setup and execution of traditional photo shoots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional photo shoots are conducted to achieve desired image quality, then consistent imaging parameters can be obtained, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging parameter consistencyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts imaging parameters by creating virtual copies and comparing their rendered appearance against reference images. This digital copying and comparison process enables precise parameter determination without incurring the high costs of multiple physical photo shoots with professional equipment and personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes expensive physical photography equipment and professional photo shoot operations with computational algorithms that analyze reference images and derive imaging parameters. This mechanical-to-computational substitution dramatically reduces costs while maintaining parameter consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If virtual 3D models are rendered with accurate imaging parameters, then image quality improves, but the complexity of determining those parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidparameter determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent breaks down the complex task of determining imaging parameters into separate, manageable components: extracting parameters from reference images, creating virtual 3D models, rendering those models, comparing results, and iteratively adjusting parameters. This segmentation transforms an overwhelming complex problem into a systematic multi-step process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where rendered images from virtual 3D models are compared against reference images, and the differences inform adjustments to imaging parameters. This iterative feedback process automatically refines parameter accuracy without requiring complex manual analysis, as the system self-corrects based on visual comparison results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250384620A1System and Method for Generating 2D Images of Virtual 3D Models According to Imaging Parameters Determined From 2D Images of Other Objects
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SHOPIFY INC
  • US20250384620A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384620A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided for generating 2D electronic images of virtual 3D models using imaging parameters determined from 2D images of other objects. The method includes determining, based on one or more 2D images of a first object arranged in a particular manner, a viewpoint capable of generating the one or more 2D images of the first object arranged in the particular manner. The method also includes generating a set of one or more 2D images of a second object, the generating including rendering a virtual 3D model of the second object according to the viewpoint. Related computer-readable media are also disclosed.