3D Orthodontic Retainer Manufacturing Without Wire Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional orthodontic retainers face challenges such as inaccurate fitting due to manual bending, material deformation leading to residual stresses and defects, and limitations in three-dimensional adjustment, which can result in mechanical stress, discomfort, and premature failure.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional orthodontic retainer is produced using a biocompatible material worked directly into its final form without deformation, utilizing computer-aided design and computer-controlled machining to create an exact fit to the teeth' surface, preserving the material's original nano- or microstructure and allowing for customized shapes and profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual bending is used to adjust the wire to fit teeth, then the retainer can be customized to individual tooth shape, but the material undergoes plastic deformation creating residual stresses and micro-cracks that weaken the material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit accuracyVSAvoidmaterial strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical bending with computer-controlled wire bending machines that use precise mechanical systems to form the wire into three-dimensional shapes matching tooth structures. This substitution eliminates plastic deformation and residual stresses while maintaining high fit accuracy through digital modeling and automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the wire material parameters by selecting materials with high elasticity and shape memory properties. These parameter changes allow the wire to be formed into precise three-dimensional shapes without permanent deformation, maintaining material strength while achieving accurate tooth fit through reversible elastic deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the wire is bent into interdental spaces to achieve precise fit, then the retainer conforms better to tooth shape, but the wire may break due to excessive deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth shape conformityVSAvoidwire durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the wire material parameters by using materials with optimized elasticity moduli and shape memory characteristics. These parameter changes enable the wire to navigate complex interdental spaces through reversible elastic deformation rather than permanent bending, achieving precise tooth conformity without breaking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic properties to the wire system through shape memory materials that can reversibly change shape in response to thermal or mechanical stimuli. This dynamic behavior allows the wire to adapt to interdental spaces and recover from deformation, maintaining strength while achieving precise fit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If heat treatment is applied to remove material defects, then the material strength is restored, but extra time and energy are required and another machine is needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heat treatment processes with computer-controlled mechanical wire bending systems that form the retainer without creating material defects. This substitution eliminates the need for additional heat treatment equipment and processes, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining material integrity through defect-free elastic deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional manual bending is used, then the process is simple, but the precision of fit is limited even with experienced dental technicians

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidfit accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual bending operations with computer-controlled wire bending machines that use digital models of tooth structures to automatically form precise three-dimensional wire shapes. This substitution maintains manufacturing simplicity through automated processes while dramatically improving fit accuracy through computer-aided design and manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional wire bending to three-dimensional wire forming using computer-controlled machines. This dimensional change enables complex spatial conformations that match the three-dimensional topology of tooth structures, achieving superior fit accuracy while maintaining ease of manufacture through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20220031427A1Three-dimensional orthodontic retainer and method for making a three-dimensional orthodontic retainer
Publication Date: 2022.02.03 HOSTETTLER JUERG
  • US20220031427A1 patent drawing
  • US20220031427A1 patent drawing
  • US20220031427A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a three-dimensional orthodontic retainer (2) and to a method for producing such a retainer (2) in which the three-dimensional orthodontic retainer (2) is matched to the exact shape of the adjacent teeth (3) and is produced from a blank (1) in such a manner that the physical properties of the material of the remaining part of the blank (1) are unchanged in the retainer (2). The method for producing the three-dimensional orthodontic retainer (2) comprises the following method steps: creating three-dimensional model of the structure of the patient's teeth (3); designing a customised, precisely fitting model of the retainer (2); producing the retainer (2) on the basis of the designed 3D model by computer-controlled deposition or application of material.