Adaptive 3D-Printed RO Membranes for Shear-Stress Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reverse osmosis membrane manufacturing methods lack customizability and granularity to deliver membrane properties tailored to specific fluid purification tasks, leading to potential membrane failure and inefficiencies due to improper pore size, chemical resistance, and mechanical strength.

Innovation Solution

A 3D-printing system integrated with sensors and machine learning to dynamically analyze fluid properties and flow characteristics, calculating shear stress and adjusting membrane design and material selection to meet task requirements, enabling real-time adaptation and production of customized membranes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional membrane manufacturing methods are used, then production process is simple, but membrane properties cannot be tailored to specific fluid purification tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane property customizationVSAvoidmanufacturing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing system transitions from static, fixed-parameter production to dynamic, adaptive manufacturing. The system continuously monitors fluid properties and flow characteristics, then adjusts membrane design parameters in real-time to optimize performance for specific purification tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies multiple membrane parameters simultaneously based on task requirements, including pore size, chemical resistance properties, and mechanical strength. These parameter changes are driven by computational models that analyze fluid properties and predict optimal membrane configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If membranes are designed for general use, then manufacturing cost is low, but membrane lifespan is reduced due to improper properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane lifespanVSAvoidmembrane property specification
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computational modeling and simulation before actual membrane manufacturing. By calculating shear stress, analyzing fluid properties, and predicting performance outcomes in advance, the system ensures membranes are pre-optimized for their specific applications, extending lifespan while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If membrane properties are not matched to task requirements, then manufacturing process is efficient, but membrane failure occurs due to improper pore size, chemical resistance, and mechanical strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane performance reliabilityVSAvoiddesign and manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where sensors monitor fluid properties and flow characteristics during operation. This real-time data feeds back to the manufacturing system, which adjusts membrane design parameters to maintain optimal performance and prevent failure modes related to pore size, chemical resistance, or mechanical strength mismatches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If custom membranes are manufactured for each task, then purification efficiency is high, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification efficiencyVSAvoidmembrane production time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs computational modeling, simulation, and design optimization before physical membrane manufacturing. By completing these intellectual tasks in advance, the system minimizes actual production time while ensuring high purification efficiency through task-optimized membrane properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances membrane quality, extends lifespan, and improves efficiency by producing membranes that meet specific task criteria, resulting in higher purity and reduced maintenance costs across various industries.

Implementation Method 1

manufacturing a semi-permeable membrane of the selected material using a 3D printer, based on the membrane design

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

reverse osmosis, which is a separation process which relies on a semipermeable membrane that allows the passage of solvent molecules (usually water) while blocking the passage of dissolved ions, molecules, and particulate matter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReverse Osmosis: Reverse Osmosis

Implementation Method 3

monitoring, by the one or more sensors, a plurality of fluid properties and flow characteristics of a fluid flowing through the fluid channel in real time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor Detection:

Data Source

PatentUS20260070019A1Adaptive 3d-printed reverse osmosis membrane manufacturing system
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20260070019A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070019A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070019A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a method, computer system, and computer program product for manufacturing a semi-permeable membrane for purifying a fluid through reverse osmosis is provided. The present invention may include calculating a shear stress exerted by the simulated fluid on semi-permeable membrane configurations; generating a membrane design for the semi-permeable membrane based on the modeling, wherein the membrane design comprises a material selected based on the calculated shear stress; and manufacturing a semi-permeable membrane of the selected material using a 3D printer, based on the membrane design.