3D Scan Surface Exclusion for Movable Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D scanning methods struggle to differentiate between movable and rigid objects when generating a virtual 3D model, as movable objects like cheeks, tongue, or instruments obstruct the view and are often captured in multiple sub-scans, making it difficult to distinguish their surfaces from the rigid object's surfaces.

Innovation Solution

The method involves creating excluded volumes in space where no surface can be present for each scan representation, disregarding surface portions located in these excluded volumes, ensuring that only rigid object surfaces contribute to the virtual 3D model by comparing overlapping scan volumes and applying threshold distances to refine the excluded volume definition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple sub-scans are acquired to obtain a complete virtual 3D model, then the completeness of the 3D model is improved, but the difficulty to differentiate between movable and rigid object surfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sub-scansVSAvoiddifficulty to differentiate surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the scanning process into multiple sub-scans, each capturing a specific portion of the object. By segmenting the data acquisition into temporal and spatial components, the system can later differentiate between surfaces that appear in only one sub-scan (movable objects) versus surfaces that appear across multiple sub-scans (rigid objects), thus resolving the contradiction between completeness and differentiation difficulty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by acquiring multiple sub-scans before final model generation. This preliminary data collection allows the system to later identify and exclude movable objects by comparing which surfaces appear consistently across the preliminary scans, enabling the differentiation problem to be solved after data acquisition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If movable objects obstruct the view of the rigid object during scanning, then the accuracy of the 3D model is worsened, but the complexity of handling movable objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of 3D modelVSAvoidcomplexity of handling movable objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes movable objects from the final 3D model by identifying surfaces that appear in only one sub-scan and excluding them. This extraction approach automatically handles the complexity of movable objects without requiring manual intervention or complex real-time control systems, thus improving measurement precision while avoiding increased device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent discards data from sub-scans where movable objects are detected, while recovering and keeping data from sub-scans where only the rigid object is visible. This selective discarding and recovering process simplifies the handling of movable objects by treating them as removable artifacts rather than requiring complex real-time management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If the scanner speed is increased to reduce scanning time, then the productivity is improved, but the likelihood of capturing movable objects in only one sub-scan increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning timeVSAvoidconsistency of capturing rigid object surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by acquiring multiple sub-scans at different time points during the scanning process. Even when scanning speed is increased, the periodic acquisition of multiple sub-scans ensures that the system can still differentiate between movable and rigid objects by temporal consistency, thus maintaining reliability while improving productivity through faster scanning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12588818B2Detection of a movable object when 3D scanning a rigid object
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 3SHAPE AS
  • US12588818B2 patent drawing
  • US12588818B2 patent drawing
  • US12588818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detecting a movable object in a location includes providing a first 3D representation of at least part of a surface; providing a second 3D representation of at least part of the surface; determining for the first 3D representation a first excluded volume in space where no surface can be present; determining for the second 3D representation a second excluded volume in space where no surface can be present; if a portion of the surface in the first 3D representation is located in space in the second excluded volume, the portion of the surface in the first 3D representation is disregarded in the generation of the virtual 3D model, and/or if a portion of the surface in the second 3D representation is located in space in the first excluded volume, the portion of the surface in the second 3D representation is disregarded in the generation of the virtual 3D model.