3D Shape Processing With Enlarged Build Surfaces for Machining Allowance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods combining cutting work and additive manufacturing face challenges in ensuring sufficient machining allowance, particularly for overhang shapes, leading to insufficient volume and tapered shapes due to the properties of additive manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional shape processing method that forms a target surface larger than the shape dimension for additive manufacturing, followed by cutting work to ensure machining allowances, allowing for the completion of the three-dimensional shape with improved productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If additive manufacturing is performed directly on the target surface without enlarging it, then the shaping process is simpler, but the machining allowance is insufficient leading to volume deficiency and tapered shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaping process simplicityVSAvoidshape accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The target surface is enlarged in advance before additive manufacturing is performed. This preliminary enlargement creates sufficient machining allowance that will be removed later, preventing volume deficiency and tapered shapes in the final product while maintaining process simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If the target surface is enlarged to ensure machining allowance, then shape accuracy is improved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The enlargement of the target surface is performed as a preliminary action before additive manufacturing. This approach simplifies the overall process by establishing the necessary machining allowance upfront, avoiding the need for complex real-time adjustments or multiple processing stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional cutting work and additive manufacturing are combined without surface enlargement, then productivity is higher, but machining allowance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidmachining allowance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The target surface enlargement is performed as a single preliminary action before additive manufacturing, rather than requiring multiple iterative adjustments during processing. This approach ensures sufficient machining allowance is available from the start, enabling efficient one-pass additive manufacturing without compromising productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11433606B2Three-dimensional shape processing method
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 OKUMA CORP
  • US11433606B2 patent drawing
  • US11433606B2 patent drawing
  • US11433606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-dimensional shape processing method processes a workpiece into a predetermined three-dimensional shape by cutting work and additive manufacturing. The method includes forming a target surface for the additive manufacturing to be larger than a shape dimension of the three-dimensional shape, performing the additive manufacturing on the target surface that has been largely formed, and performing the cutting work on a region where the additive manufacturing has been performed to complete the three-dimensional shape.