3D Shaping Defect Prevention via Beam Reflection Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current three-dimensional shaping methods using laser or electron beam sintering often result in sintering defects due to uneven beam control and powder layer issues, which are not detectable until completion of all laminating and sintering steps, leading to defective products.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves measuring the reflection intensity of the laser or electron beam during each sintering step, canceling sintering if defects are detected, and using spectral imaging to differentiate between beam control and powder layer surface problems, allowing for real-time defect detection and prevention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If laser beam or electron beam control system is used for sintering, then three-dimensional shaping can be achieved, but sintering defects occur due to excess or insufficiency of beam supply

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional shaping capabilityVSAvoidsintering surface flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by measuring the reflection intensity of the laser beam or electron beam during sintering and comparing it against predetermined standards. When the reflection intensity falls outside the standard range, the system automatically issues a command to cancel further sintering, preventing defect propagation while maintaining the capability for three-dimensional shaping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If powder layer formation and sintering are repeated in a sealed apparatus, then three-dimensional shaped products can be produced, but sintering defects are overlooked until completion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoiddefect detection timing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing reflection intensity measurement and defect judgment during each sintering step before the entire manufacturing process completes. This allows early detection of sintering defects and immediate cancellation of subsequent steps, preventing defective products while maintaining production efficiency through real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If sintering continues without real-time defect detection, then manufacturing process is simple, but defective three-dimensional shaped products are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism that measures reflection intensity during sintering and compares it to predetermined standards. When defects are detected (reflection intensity outside standard range), the system automatically commands cancellation of further sintering. This maintains relatively simple device complexity while dramatically improving manufacturing precision and product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the cancellation of defective sintering steps, preventing further lamination and sintering, and allows for efficient production of defect-free three-dimensional shaped products by identifying and correcting the cause of defects.

Implementation Method 1

a sintering step in which the powder layer is sintered by irradiation of a moving laser beam or electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam irradiation: Laser

Implementation Method 2

a sintering step in which the powder layer is sintered by irradiation of a moving laser beam or electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam irradiation: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

a sintering step in which the powder layer is sintered by irradiation of a moving laser beam or electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 4

Measuring the reflection intensity of the laser beam or electron beam irradiated during each sintering step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10576684B2Three-dimensional shaping method
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 MATSUURA MACHINERY CO LTD
  • US10576684B2 patent drawing
  • US10576684B2 patent drawing
  • US10576684B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-dimensional shaping method utilizing a powder layer forming step, and a sintering step with a laser beam or electron beam, the method including the steps of a) measuring the reflection intensity of the beam irradiated in each sintering step, or the reflection intensity of other light, b) commanding to continue sintering within the next time unit, or when the next powder layer forming step is given, when it has been detected that the reflection intensity of the step a) is within a standard range for a given time unit, and, c) judging that a sintering defect has been produced, and commanding to cancel sintering in the next time unit, or when the next powder layer forming step is given, when it is detected that a condition has occurred in which the reflection intensity of step a) deviates from the standard range for a given time unit.