3D Shaping with Reheating and Secondary Filling for Dimensional Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing three-dimensional shaping methods using fused deposition modeling often result in lacking or excess portions due to material shrinkage, leading to inaccuracies in the final product, as these irregularities may not be fully addressed by cutting processing, compromising the dimensional accuracy of the shaped article.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that include a shaping step with a cutting allowance, followed by measurement and comparison to identify and correct excess or lacking portions through additional cutting and shaping processes, ensuring accurate removal or filling of these irregularities before finalizing the product.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If cutting processing is performed on the three-dimensional shaped article, then the target shape can be achieved, but lacking portions or excess portions may remain due to shrinkage by cooling or shaping accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the three-dimensional shape measurement unit measures the actual shape of the shaped article, and the controller compares the measured shape with the target shape to identify lacking or excess portions. Based on this feedback, the system automatically generates additional shaping data to correct the identified deviations, ensuring consistent quality and dimensional accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by adding a cutting allowance to the target shape data before shaping. This preliminary modification of the shaping data ensures that the initial shaped article includes extra material that can be removed during cutting processing, compensating for anticipated shrinkage and shaping inaccuracies before the actual shaping occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If additional shaping steps are performed to fill lacking portions, then dimensional accuracy is improved, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing additional shaping only on the specific lacking portions identified through measurement and comparison, rather than re-shaping the entire article. The system generates additional shaping data only for the regions where deviations are detected, minimizing unnecessary processing time while maintaining dimensional accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple cutting and shaping steps are performed, then dimensional accuracy is improved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple operations into an integrated automated system. The controller combines shaping, cutting, measurement, and correction processes into a unified workflow where shaping data is automatically generated and updated based on measurement feedback. This integration reduces manual intervention and simplifies the overall process despite multiple steps being involved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of three-dimensional shaped articles with high dimensional accuracy by systematically addressing and correcting irregularities, preventing residual errors and ensuring a precise final product.

Implementation Method 1

a heating unit configured to heat the upper face of the shaped first portion to a temperature equal to or higher than a melting point of the thermoplastic resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a shaping unit configured to eject molten material onto the heated upper face of the shaped first portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

ejecting the molten material so as to fill the specified lacking portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11794407B2Method for producing three-dimensional shaped article using applied reheating and secondary shaping steps
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11794407B2 patent drawing
  • US11794407B2 patent drawing
  • US11794407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a three-dimensional shaped article includes shaping a first portion constituting at least a part of the three-dimensional shaped article by ejecting a molten material according to shaping data generated based on a shape resulting from adding a cutting allowance for cutting processing to a target shape of the three-dimensional shaped article, performing the cutting processing for the first portion, obtaining a measured shape of the first portion by measuring a shape of the first portion, specifying an excess portion and a lacking portion of the first portion by comparing a shape of a portion corresponding to the first portion of the target shape with the measured shape, performing the cutting processing for the specified excess portion when the excess portion was specified, and ejecting the molten material so as to fill the specified lacking portion when the lacking portion was specified.