3D Shaping via Section Segmentation and Multi-Axis Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming three-dimensional shaped objects by lamination and cutting are limited by the inability of cutting tools to reach all areas, particularly in complex shapes like tubular structures, leading to incomplete shaping due to the tool's cuttable length constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a three-dimensional shaping device that divides the shaping process into sections, each with a length shorter than the cutting tool's maximum length, allowing for incremental shaping and cutting along multiple directions to accommodate complex geometries without leaving uncut margins.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single cutting tool is used to cut the entire three-dimensional shaped object, then the cutting process is simple, but the cutting tool cannot reach all areas particularly in complex shapes like tubular structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting process simplicityVSAvoidcompleteness of shaping
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The three-dimensional shaped object is divided into multiple sections, each with a length shorter than the cutting tool's maximum cuttable length. This segmentation allows the cutting tool to access and cut each section completely, solving the problem of inaccessible areas in complex shapes while maintaining operational simplicity through systematic processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If the three-dimensional shaped object is formed as a single continuous piece, then the structure is complete, but the cutting tool cannot reach all areas for complete cutting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural completenessVSAvoidcutting accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The object is segmented into multiple sections that are formed and cut separately, then joined together. This approach maintains structural completeness through proper joining of sections while ensuring cutting accessibility by making each section short enough for the tool to reach all areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The object is divided not only by length but also by orientation in different directions. Sections are arranged in multiple dimensions and joined accordingly, allowing the cutting tool to access all surfaces of each individual section while reconstructing the complete three-dimensional structure through spatial arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Shape

If sections are joined to form a longer object, then the desired three-dimensional shape is achieved, but the joining process adds complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional object formationVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The object is segmented into manageable sections that can be independently formed and cut, then joined to create the final three-dimensional shape. This segmentation approach achieves complex geometries while controlling process complexity through systematic formation and joining of standardized sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If the cutting tool length is increased to reach all areas, then complete cutting is possible, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of cuttingVSAvoidcutting tool specifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using an excessively long cutting tool, the object is segmented into sections with lengths suitable for standard cutting tools. This approach achieves complete cutting of all areas while avoiding the complexity and cost associated with specialized long-reach cutting tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12005506B2Method for shaping three-dimensional shaped object
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US12005506B2 patent drawing
  • US12005506B2 patent drawing
  • US12005506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for shaping a three-dimensional shaped object using a cutting tool configured to perform cutting at a first length at maximum in a predetermined cutting direction, the method including: a first section shaping step of shaping a first section having a length in a first direction shorter than the first length by laminating a shaping material; a first section cutting step of cutting the first section with the cutting tool having a cutting direction along the first direction; a second section shaping step of shaping a second section having a length in a second direction shorter than the first length by laminating the shaping material, to connect to a first end surface of the first section in the first direction; and a second section cutting step of cutting the second section along the second direction with the cutting tool having a cutting direction along the second direction.