3D Shaping Spark Detection for Sintering Defect Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current three-dimensional shaping methods using laser or electron beams struggle to prevent sintering defects due to irregular beam control and powder layer issues, leading to non-flat surfaces and incomplete joining, which are only detected after completion of the process.

Innovation Solution

A method that photographs and measures the sparks generated during powder fly-off to detect sintering defects in real-time, allowing for immediate cancellation of the sintering step and identification of the defect cause, enabling the correction and prevention of defective products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If laser beam or electron beam irradiation is performed on powder layer during sintering step, then powder layer is sintered to form three-dimensional shaped product, but sintering defects occur due to control system problems or powder layer issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesintering qualityVSAvoidprocess stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by photographing sparks generated during sintering and using image processing to detect abnormalities in real-time. When defects are detected through spark pattern analysis, the system automatically stops the sintering process, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents defective products from being produced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sparks as an intermediary indicator to detect sintering defects. Instead of directly monitoring the sintering process or the final product quality, the system uses the sparks generated during powder fly-off as a mediator to indirectly detect abnormalities in the sintering process, enabling early defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If sintering process continues without interruption, then production efficiency is maintained, but defective products are produced when sintering defects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The real-time spark detection system provides immediate feedback on sintering quality, allowing the system to stop the process only when defects are detected. This minimizes interruptions to production while ensuring that defective products are not produced, optimizing both productivity and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows the sintering process to proceed uninterrupted through normal variations, only stopping when actual defects are detected. This approach skips unnecessary stops for minor fluctuations while rushing through the detection and stopping process immediately when real defects occur, balancing efficiency and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If spark detection system is implemented, then sintering defects can be detected in real-time, but device complexity increases due to additional measurement equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses sparks as an intermediary that already exist during the sintering process. Instead of adding complex sensors to directly measure sintering quality, the system photographs the naturally occurring sparks and analyzes their patterns, adding minimal equipment while achieving effective defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a visual copy (photograph) of the sparks generated during sintering and analyzes this copy to detect defects. This approach allows indirect measurement of sintering quality through image processing without requiring direct contact sensors or complex measurement devices in the sintering zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Manufacturing precision

If sintering step is cancelled when defect is detected, then production of defective products is prevented, but production time increases due to process interruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows the sintering process to rush through normally detected variations without stopping, only interrupting when actual defects are confirmed by the spark detection system. This minimizes unnecessary time loss while preventing defective product production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Solution Approach 2:

The real-time feedback from spark detection enables immediate stopping when defects are found, preventing waste of additional time and materials on obviously defective products. The system provides just-in-time intervention only when necessary, optimizing the balance between quality control and production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach prevents the production of defective three-dimensional shaped products by allowing for the cancellation of sintering steps and identification of defect causes, enabling efficient correction and production of defect-free products.

Implementation Method 1

sparks are constantly generated as the powder flies off (sputtering)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 2

a sintering step of the powder layer by a laser beam or electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 3

the powder layer is sintered by irradiation of a moving laser beam or electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 4

the powder layer is sintered by irradiation of a moving laser beam or electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam heating: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS10773459B2Three-dimensional shaping method
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 MATSUURA MACHINERY CO LTD
  • US10773459B2 patent drawing
  • US10773459B2 patent drawing
  • US10773459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-dimensional shaping method utilizing a powder layer forming step, and a sintering step with a laser beam or electron beam, the method including the steps of a) measuring a light intensity of sparks and photographing the sparks generated with fly-off of powder caused by irradiation of the beam over the entire periphery of the sintering region, b) commanding to continue sintering within the next time unit or the next powder layer forming step, when it is detected that the region width and light intensity are within the standard ranges for a given time unit, and c) commanding to cancel sintering in the next time unit or the next powder layer forming step when a sintering defect has occurred, when it is detected that a condition has occurred in which the region width and light intensity deviate from the standard ranges for a given time unit.