3D Porous Sorbent Structure via Phase Inversion Drying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D-printed inorganic porous sorbent structures face issues such as reduced sorbent accessibility, micropore volume, and mechanical brittleness, requiring complex and energy-intensive processes like calcination and sintering, which lead to inefficient use and reduced activity of the sorbent material.

Innovation Solution

A method involving 3D printing a porous green body from a build material comprising inorganic sorbent material and organic binder material, with phase inversion and drying, avoiding calcination and sintering, to maintain high sorbent accessibility and mechanical strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If calcination and sintering are applied to 3D-printed inorganic porous sorbent structures, then mechanical strength is improved, but sorbent accessibility and micropore volume are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidsorbent accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the thermal processing parameters by replacing conventional calcination (high temperature, prolonged heating) and sintering with a milder drying process at lower temperatures. This parameter change allows the green body to achieve sufficient mechanical strength without the harmful thermal effects that block pores and reduce sorbent accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the typically harmful effect of thermal treatment (which causes pore blocking and sorbent deactivation) into a beneficial process. By using controlled drying instead of calcination and sintering, the process achieves mechanical strengthening while preserving pore structure and sorbent activity, effectively turning a harmful thermal process into a beneficial low-temperature drying process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Strength

If calcination and sintering are applied to 3D-printed inorganic porous sorbent structures, then mechanical strength is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the temperature and time parameters of the thermal processing step. Instead of conventional calcination (high temperature, prolonged heating) and sintering, the invention uses a drying process at significantly lower temperatures, dramatically reducing energy consumption while still achieving the required mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a temporary organic binder that is removed during the drying process, replacing the need for expensive and energy-intensive calcination and sintering operations. This approach uses a disposable, easily removable binder instead of permanent ceramic binders that require high-energy processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional 3D printing with inorganic materials is used, then structural complexity is improved, but brittleness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidmechanical brittleness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure combining inorganic sorbent particles with an organic binder matrix. This composite approach allows the formation of complex 3D structures with high mechanical strength, as the organic binder provides flexibility and toughness while the inorganic particles provide functional sorption properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material state and processing parameters by using a viscous paste composition that can be 3D-printed into complex geometries. The organic binder material and solvent system allow for flexible formability of complex structures without the brittleness associated with conventional inorganic 3D printing, as the organic component provides ductility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If thermal treatment is applied to remove organic binder, then mechanical strength is improved, but sorbent activity is reduced due to carbon residue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidsorbent activity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the typically harmful thermal decomposition process (calcination) into a beneficial controlled drying process. This eliminates carbon residue formation while still achieving the removal of the organic binder, thereby preserving sorbent activity and preventing the deactivation that would occur with conventional thermal treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent fundamentally changes the temperature and atmospheric conditions of the binder removal process. Instead of high-temperature calcination in an oxidizing atmosphere that produces carbon residues, the invention uses low-temperature drying that removes the organic binder through evaporation and decomposition without forming harmful carbon deposits, thus preserving sorbent activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces 3D porous sorbent structures with maintained sorbent accessibility and microporous volume, achieving high sorbent capacity and mechanical strength without energy-intensive processes, suitable for gas and liquid sorption applications.

Implementation Method 1

inducing phase inversion of the three-dimensional porous green body by exposing the three-dimensional porous green body to a non-solvent for the organic binder material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase inversion: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

drying the solidified three-dimensional porous green body, thereby obtaining the three-dimensional porous sorbent structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrying: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS20260008029A1Method for producing a three-dimensional porous sorbent structure
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 VLAAMSE INSTELLING VOOR TECHNOLOGISCH ONDERZOEK NV (VITO)
  • US20260008029A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008029A1 patent drawing
  • US20260008029A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a 3D porous sorbent structure may include building a 3D porous green body from a build material including a solvent, an inorganic porous sorbent material, and an organic binder material dissolved in the solvent. The build material is deposited as filaments in a plurality of stacked layers to obtain the 3D porous green body, and at least some of the filaments are spaced apart; inducing phase inversion of the body by exposing it to a non-solvent for the organic binder material. The solidified body is dried to obtain the 3D porous sorbent structure. The build material has 30-70% by weight of the inorganic porous sorbent material and 5-30% by weight of the organic binder material, based on the total weight of the build material, the 3D porous sorbent structure comprising at least a portion of the organic binder material.