3D Surface Repair Machining for Precise Defect Finishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for repairing or finishing components, such as turbine blades, are manually driven and prone to inconsistency and health risks due to human intervention, leading to non-optimal repairs and health issues like vibration white finger.

Innovation Solution

A method involving scanning the component's surface to obtain 3D data, locating defects, and generating a tooling path using a patch with translated nodes to machine the surface automatically, reducing human error and health risks while improving finish quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual polishing is used to repair surface defects, then the process is flexible and easy to operate, but the repair consistency and precision deteriorate due to operator skill variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidrepair precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical polishing system with an automated system that uses 3D scanning to capture surface defects and generates toolpaths for precise removal. The automated machining system executes the toolpath with consistent precision, eliminating operator skill variation while maintaining ease of operation through computer control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the defective surface through 3D scanning, then uses this digital model to generate the repair toolpath. This copying approach allows the repair process to be precisely replicated based on the digital twin, ensuring consistent results without manual intervention variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of manufacture

If manual polishing with vibrating equipment is used, then the repair process can be performed, but operator health deteriorates due to vibration white finger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair capabilityVSAvoidoperator health impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual vibrating polishing equipment with an automated machining system. The vibration and harmful mechanical exposure are transferred from the operator to the automated machine, eliminating health risks like vibration white finger while maintaining the repair capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system performs the repair task independently without requiring human operators to physically handle vibrating equipment. The machine serves itself by automatically executing the generated toolpath, removing the operator from direct exposure to harmful vibrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If visual inspection and hand polishing are used, then the process is simple and requires minimal equipment, but repair effectiveness deteriorates due to reliance on operator experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidrepair effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual inspection and hand polishing with 3D scanning technology that objectively captures surface geometry. This substitution removes reliance on operator experience and visual judgment, providing reliable, measurable data for consistent repair effectiveness while keeping the overall process straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D scanning system provides objective feedback about the surface defect geometry, which is then used to generate the repair toolpath. This feedback loop replaces subjective visual inspection with measurable data, ensuring repair effectiveness is based on actual surface conditions rather than operator perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If automated machining with 3D scanning is used, then repair precision and consistency improve, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair precisionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into a unified automated system: 3D scanning for defect detection, digital modeling for repair planning, and automated machining for execution. This multi-functionality achieves high repair precision while managing complexity through integration rather than separate manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual coordination (visual inspection + hand polishing + vibration equipment) with a single automated system that handles all functions through computer control. This substitution manages complexity by centralizing control logic in software rather than requiring coordinated manual skills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11883927B2Method of machining a component
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US11883927B2 patent drawing
  • US11883927B2 patent drawing
  • US11883927B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of machining a surface of a component. The method comprises scanning the surface of the component to obtain scanned electronic 3D data representing the scanned surface of the component locating a surface defect of the scanned surface and identifying a defect region that surrounds and includes the surface defect, and providing electronic 3D data representing a patch having the desired shape of the defect region. The method also comprises transforming the patch to generate a tooling path for repairing the surface defect. The transformation comprising translating a plurality of nodes of the patch. The translation distance of each node based on the distance of that node from an origin node of the patch. The method further comprises machining the surface of the component according to the generated tooling path.