3D Surface Printing Apparatus with Dynamic Nozzle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional printing apparatuses struggle with precise printing on three-dimensional (3D) surfaces due to variations in electric field distribution caused by the surface shape, making it difficult to maintain consistent printing conditions.

Innovation Solution

A printing apparatus that uses a machine learning-based printing predictive model to adjust printing conditions in real-time, taking into account ejecting environment information such as 3D surface shape, ink viscosity, and electric field distribution, to control the impact path of droplets and achieve precise printing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a constant distance between the nozzle and the 3D surface is maintained, then the printing process is simple to control, but printing precision deteriorates due to varied electric field distribution caused by surface shape variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidprinting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the nozzle position adjustable and controllable in real-time. The nozzle is positioned at different heights and angles depending on the local surface geometry being printed, allowing the system to adapt to 3D surface variations rather than maintaining a fixed constant distance. This dynamic positioning enables consistent printing precision across uneven surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through a sensor system that detects the actual surface geometry in real-time and provides this information to the control system. The control system then adjusts the nozzle position and printing parameters based on this feedback, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains printing precision despite surface variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If electrohydrodynamics (EHD) is used to eject droplets, then ultrafine droplets and high viscosity ink can be ejected, but printing precision on 3D surfaces deteriorates due to electric field variation caused by surface shape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink ejection capabilityVSAvoidprinting precision on 3D surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines EHD droplet ejection with dynamic nozzle positioning. The nozzle is actively adjusted to maintain optimal distance and angle relative to the local surface being printed, compensating for the electric field variations that occur on 3D surfaces. This allows EHD to maintain its advantage of ejecting ultrafine droplets and high viscosity ink while achieving precision on complex geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes multiple parameters including nozzle position (height and angle), voltage applied to the EHD electrode, and droplet ejection timing based on the detected surface geometry. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system compensates for electric field variations and maintains consistent droplet placement precision across 3D surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If machine learning-based predictive model is implemented, then printing precision on 3D surfaces is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using machine learning to pre-calculate optimal printing paths and parameters for given 3D surface geometries. The system analyzes the surface model in advance, determines the best nozzle positions and ejection parameters for each location, and generates a optimized printing plan before actual printing begins. This reduces real-time computational complexity while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computational intermediary layer (the machine learning predictive model) that sits between the surface geometry input and the physical printing process. This intermediary pre-processes the geometry data, predicts optimal printing parameters, and translates complex 3D surface information into simplified control instructions for the hardware, reducing the burden on the real-time control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus enables precise printing on 3D surfaces by dynamically adjusting printing conditions based on real-time environmental data, improving printing accuracy and consistency compared to traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

a printing apparatus based on electrohydrodynamics (EHD) provides ejection energy by applying electrostatic force to a liquid surface of ink formed at the end of a nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a printing apparatus based on electrohydrodynamics (EHD)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrohydrodynamics: Electrohydrodynamics

Implementation Method 3

the droplets ejected by the force of an electric field are affected by change in their surrounding electric field during flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS12325192B2Printing apparatus for 3D surface
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 ENJET CO LTD
  • US12325192B2 patent drawing
  • US12325192B2 patent drawing
  • US12325192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a printing apparatus for a 3D surface, which performs printing by ejecting a droplet onto a 3D surface and controlling an electric field on an impact path of the droplet, the printing apparatus including: a ejecting environment information provider configured to provide ejecting environment information between a nozzle and an impact point; and a controller configured to predict a result of printing on an actual substrate by accumulating previous printing results according to printing conditions and the ejecting environment information into a database, and perform the printing on the 3D surface while changing the printing conditions provided by the database based on the ejecting environment information provided by the ejecting environment information provider.