3D Surface Assessment for Abrasive Tool Life Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring abrasive surface removal processes lack the ability to quickly and accurately identify when abrasive tools or components are nearing failure, leading to potential damage and reduced surface quality.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using 3D scanning and predictive modeling to assess the degradation of abrasive tools and components, incorporating training data and simulation of surface evolution over time, allowing for precise estimation of tool lifespan and surface quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual inspection or post-process quality assessment is used to monitor abrasive surface removal, then the monitoring method is simple to implement, but the ability to quickly and accurately identify tool failure or component degradation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to identify tool failureVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/visual inspection methods with optical scanning and computational imaging systems. A 3D imaging system captures surface topography data, which is then processed through algorithms to detect abrasive grain characteristics, enabling automated, high-precision monitoring without complex mechanical contact probes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates digital copies (3D surface maps) of the abrasive tool surface to analyze grain distribution, protrusion heights, and wear patterns. These digital replicas allow virtual assessment of tool condition without physical intervention, enabling rapid identification of degradation while keeping the physical monitoring system relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If detailed kinematic modelling of workpiece and tool interaction is used, then the process can be modeled in detail, but the modeling process becomes slow and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidmodeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential features needed for wear prediction from complex kinematic models. Instead of modeling complete tool-workpiece interactions, it focuses specifically on abrasive grain surface topography characteristics (protrusion heights, spacing, distribution) that directly correlate with material removal rates and tool wear, eliminating unnecessary modeling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex kinematic parameters into simplified surface topography parameters. By measuring grain protrusion heights, spacing, and distribution directly from 3D scans, the system replaces time-consuming force and motion calculations with direct geometric measurements that provide equivalent predictive accuracy for wear and surface finish

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If no monitoring system is used, then the system is simple to operate, but abrasive tools and components cannot be identified when close to failure, leading to damage and reduced surface quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool life prediction accuracyVSAvoidprocess monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the abrasive tool to essentially monitor its own condition. By scanning the tool surface and analyzing grain topography changes, the system allows the tool to self-diagnose its wear state and predict remaining life without requiring external sensors or complex monitoring infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where surface scan data is continuously analyzed to update predictions of tool life and component quality. The system compares current grain characteristics against baseline data and wear models, providing real-time feedback on tool condition and predicting when replacement or reconditioning is needed, thereby improving reliability while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12456253B2Surface assessment
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US12456253B2 patent drawing
  • US12456253B2 patent drawing
  • US12456253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method of modelling the degradation of at least a component within an abrasive environment, the method comprising: obtaining a 3D scan of a surface of a component, processing the surface images of the component, determining the surface properties, inputting the data into a trained prediction model, predicting the performance of the component, and simulating the surface evolution over time or use of the component.