3D Tire Sipe Geometry for Wear-Stable Wet and Snow Grip

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tire tread sipe geometry changes due to wear, leading to reduced adhesion on wet and snow-covered surfaces and accelerated wear on dry surfaces, while complex geometries complicate mold extraction and may cause micro-damage.

Innovation Solution

A tire tread with a sipe geometry featuring three levels of depth and spacing, optimizing void percentage and stiffness to maintain performance across surface types and facilitating mold extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If sipes are made deeper to facilitate mold extraction, then ease of manufacture is improved, but tread stiffness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold extractionVSAvoidtread stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sipe geometry features local variation in depth, with the greatest depth at the center and reduced depth toward the edges. This localized depth variation facilitates mold extraction from the center region while preserving tread stiffness at the edges, resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and tread strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a uniform two-dimensional sipe cross-section to a three-dimensional varying depth profile. This dimensional change allows the sipe to provide extraction clearance in the central region while maintaining structural integrity at the boundaries, simultaneously improving manufacturability and preserving strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If sipe geometry is made complex to maintain adhesion performance, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion performanceVSAvoidsipe geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention varies the depth parameter of the sipe geometry continuously from the center toward the edges, creating a gradient structure. This parameter change maintains adhesion performance by preserving biting edges while reducing overall geometric complexity compared to uniformly deep or highly variable sipe designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If void percentage is increased to improve wet and snow adhesion, then reliability is improved, but tread rigidity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewet and snow adhesionVSAvoidtread rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The varying depth sipe geometry creates local variations in void distribution, with greater void volume in the center region for enhanced adhesion and reduced void volume at edges for maintained rigidity. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between wet/snow performance and overall tread stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4188721B1Tire with 3d-sipe and tire
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 BRIDGESTONE EURO NV SA
  • EP4188721B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4188721B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a tread for tires. In particular, it refers to a tread that has a sipe geometry with 3 levels.