3D Ultrasound Fluid Quantification via Computational Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sonographic detection of free fluid in body cavities requires trained operators to visually analyze two-dimensional images, which is inefficient and prone to errors, and does not allow for accurate quantification or monitoring of fluid volume changes over time.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing three-dimensional ultrasound imaging with automated volume acquisition and processing, where data from an ultrasound transducer is used to generate three-dimensional sonographic images, allowing for the identification and calculation of fluid volume within body cavities using techniques such as stacked crescents, spherical fill, convex hull, and triangulation processes, enabling semi-automated or fully automated fluid measurement and monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If two-dimensional ultrasound imaging with visual analysis is used, then operator expertise and experience can be leveraged, but measurement precision and quantification capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid volume measurement precisionVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional ultrasound imaging to three-dimensional volumetric imaging. This dimensional change enables automated volume calculation through computational algorithms while maintaining clinical utility. The 3D imaging capability allows precise quantification of fluid collections in body cavities without requiring complex manual measurements, thereby improving measurement precision while managing device complexity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If automated three-dimensional imaging is implemented, then measurement precision and quantification are improved, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid measurement efficiencyVSAvoidimage processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated algorithms that independently perform volume calculation without requiring operator intervention. The system automatically processes 3D ultrasound data, identifies fluid collections, and computes volumes using computational geometry algorithms. This automation dramatically improves productivity by eliminating manual measurement tasks while managing processing complexity through optimized algorithms and integrated hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement processes with automated computational algorithms. Instead of requiring operators to visually estimate and manually calculate fluid volumes from 2D images, the system uses computer-based algorithms to automatically compute 3D volumes. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated computational methods improves efficiency while managing complexity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If visual analysis of two-dimensional images is performed, then operator flexibility is maintained, but monitoring of fluid volume changes over time is not enabled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of fluid detectionVSAvoidtime for volume measurement and monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous monitoring of fluid volume changes through automated 3D imaging. The system can repeatedly acquire volumetric data over time and automatically compare measurements to detect changes in fluid collection size. This continuous automated monitoring improves reliability by providing consistent, repeatable measurements while reducing the time required compared to manual visual analysis, as the automated system can rapidly process multiple images without operator fatigue or variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate and automated measurement of fluid volumes within body cavities, reducing operator dependence and enabling real-time monitoring of fluid changes, thus improving the assessment and treatment of conditions like hemorrhage and intravascular volume changes.

Implementation Method 1

data is received with an interface, the data being received from an ultrasound transducer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasound: Ultrasound

Data Source

PatentUS11123042B2Automated three and four-dimensional ultrasound quantification and surveillance of free fluid in body cavities and intravascular volume
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US11123042B2 patent drawing
  • US11123042B2 patent drawing
  • US11123042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention provides a method to measure fluid within a body cavity where data is received with an interface (210), the data being received from an ultrasound transducer. A three-dimensional sonographic image is generated with an image generator (220) connected to the interface (210), the three-dimensional sonographic image being generated from the data from the ultrasound transducer. The body cavity is identified in the three-dimensional sonographic image with an image processor (230) connected to the image generator (220); and, an area of fluid in the body cavity in the three-dimensional sonographic image is identified with the image processor (230). The volume of the area of fluid is calculated using the three-dimensional sonographic image and a stacked crescents process, a spherical fill process, a convex hull process, and/or a triangulation process.